[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/4] i965: Issue performance warnings on MapBufferRange stalls.

Kristian Høgsberg krh at bitplanet.net
Fri Sep 26 09:28:08 PDT 2014


On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org> wrote:
> On Friday, August 29, 2014 11:10:48 PM Kenneth Graunke wrote:
>> This is easy: we just need to use brw_map_bo instead of mapping it
>> directly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
>> ---
>>  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_buffer_objects.c | 7 ++++---
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_buffer_objects.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_buffer_objects.c
>> index 96dacde..fb806dc 100644
>> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_buffer_objects.c
>> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_buffer_objects.c
>> @@ -421,8 +421,8 @@ intel_bufferobj_map_range(struct gl_context * ctx,
>>                                                            intel_obj->map_extra[index],
>>                                                            alignment);
>>        if (brw->has_llc) {
>> -         drm_intel_bo_map(intel_obj->range_map_bo[index],
>> -                          (access & GL_MAP_WRITE_BIT) != 0);
>> +         brw_bo_map(brw, intel_obj->range_map_bo[index],
>> +                    (access & GL_MAP_WRITE_BIT) != 0, "range-map");
>>        } else {
>>           drm_intel_gem_bo_map_gtt(intel_obj->range_map_bo[index]);
>>        }
>> @@ -438,7 +438,8 @@ intel_bufferobj_map_range(struct gl_context * ctx,
>>        drm_intel_gem_bo_map_gtt(intel_obj->buffer);
>>        intel_bufferobj_mark_inactive(intel_obj);
>>     } else {
>> -      drm_intel_bo_map(intel_obj->buffer, (access & GL_MAP_WRITE_BIT) != 0);
>> +      brw_bo_map(brw, intel_obj->buffer, (access & GL_MAP_WRITE_BIT) != 0,
>> +                 "MapBufferRange");
>>        intel_bufferobj_mark_inactive(intel_obj);
>>     }
>
> It's been a month and patches 2-4 haven't received any review.  Could someone take a look?

Sorry, I saw them go by but didn't review.  I like 4/4 a lot.

Kristian

> Thanks,
> --Ken
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list