[Mesa-dev] New stable-branch 11.0 candidate pushed

[Emil Velikov]

On 7 December 2015 at 17:46, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 7 December 2015 at 15:09, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello list,
>>>>
>>>> The candidate for the Mesa 11.0.7 is now available. Currently we have:
>>>>  - 43 queued
>>>>  - 24 nominated (outstanding)
>>>>  - and 1 rejected/obsolete patches
>>>>
>>>> Nominated (24)
>>>> ==============
>>>>
>>>> Ilia Mirkin (6):
>>>>       freedreno/a4xx: support lod_bias
>>>>       freedreno/a4xx: fix 5_5_5_1 texture sampler format
>>>>       freedreno/a4xx: point regid to "red" even for alpha-only rb formats
>>>>       nvc0/ir: fold postfactor into immediate
>>>>       nv50/ir: deal with loops with no breaks
>>>>       nv50/ir: fix DCE to not generate 96-bit loads
>>>
>>> Any particular reason to hold these up? They're all fixing real
>>> issues, and most were pushed quite a while ago.
>>>
>> The nouveau ones haven't landed in master (as of a few days ago) while
>> the freedreno ones are missing the 11.0 note. Was meaning to confirm
>> on the latter ones (if we do want them for 11.0), as at least one of
>> them did not pick cleanly.
>
> The freedreno ones all went in before the 11.1 branchpoint, thus no
> reason for the extra version tag.
Ouch I see what's happening here. I'll tweak things on my end to check
for "date merged in master" as opposed to "sent to the ML"

> The nouveau ones landed nearly a
> week ago (Dec 2 from the looks of it).
>

nv50/ir: fix DCE to not generate 96-bit loads
CommitDate: Thu Dec 3 23:02:57 2015 -0500

vs

Top of 11.0
CommitDate: Thu Dec 3 18:54:25 2015 +0000

I.e. missed by a few hours. And yes I was meaning to send this (and
11.1) earlier, although relocating ate a bit more time than expected
:-\

Thanks for spotting these out Ilia. I truly appreciate it.

-Emil