[Mesa-dev] [RFC] glapi: Build gl_gentable.c only on Darwin
Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
jeremyhu at apple.com
Wed Dec 9 09:17:54 PST 2015
The general concept of this change seems fine to me.
Given the desire to keep glapi as similar as possible across platforms, would it be better to just move this into glx/apple rather than leaving it in glapi?
> On Dec 9, 2015, at 09:07, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9 December 2015 at 14:11, Andreas Boll <andreas.boll.dev at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Removes the public symbol _glapi_create_table_from_handle from
>> libGL.so.1 on all plattforms except Darwin.
> typo -> platforms
>> Since the symbol is not used on other plattforms it makes sense to
>> build gl_gentable.c only on Darwin.
> Ideally we'll keep the dispatch as close to identical across all
> platforms (i.e. we'll nuke this), although for now this will do.
> Out of curiosity is there any noticeable difference in the build times?
>> XXX If we still want to distribute gl_gentable.c in the release tarball
>> we could drop the changes in src/mapi/glapi/gen/Makefile.am
> Yes please. We want to ship all the generated sources, regardless of
> the platform they're used.
>> index 2da8f7d..25ea44a 100644
>> --- a/src/mapi/glapi/gen/Makefile.am
>> +++ b/src/mapi/glapi/gen/Makefile.am
>> @@ -27,8 +27,11 @@ MESA_GLAPI_OUTPUTS = \
>> $(MESA_GLAPI_DIR)/glapi_mapi_tmp.h \
>> $(MESA_GLAPI_DIR)/glprocs.h \
>> $(MESA_GLAPI_DIR)/glapitemp.h \
>> - $(MESA_GLAPI_DIR)/glapitable.h \
>> - $(MESA_GLAPI_DIR)/glapi_gentable.c
>> + $(MESA_GLAPI_DIR)/glapitable.h
>> +if HAVE_APPLEDRI
>> +MESA_GLAPI_OUTPUTS += $(MESA_GLAPI_DIR)/glapi_gentable.c
>> MESA_GLAPI_ASM_OUTPUTS =
>> if HAVE_X86_ASM
>> @@ -88,8 +91,11 @@ XORG_GLAPI_DIR = $(XORG_BASE)/glx
>> XORG_GLAPI_OUTPUTS = \
>> $(XORG_GLAPI_DIR)/glprocs.h \
>> $(XORG_GLAPI_DIR)/glapitable.h \
>> - $(XORG_GLAPI_DIR)/dispatch.h \
>> + $(XORG_GLAPI_DIR)/dispatch.h
>> +if HAVE_APPLEDRI
> Erm missing XORG_GLAPI_OUTPUTS += ?
> Afaict even with the above makefile changes the file should still be
> in the in the tarball. Am I missing something ?
> Would be great if Jeremy (or someone else) has the chance to test
> this, in case we've missing something.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4109 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the mesa-dev