[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] nir: Add a pass to lower vector phi nodes to scalar phi nodes
Jason Ekstrand
jason at jlekstrand.net
Mon Jan 26 15:11:43 PST 2015
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net> wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net> writes:
> > diff --git a/src/glsl/nir/nir_lower_phis_to_scalar.c
> b/src/glsl/nir/nir_lower_phis_to_scalar.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..9f901d6
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/src/glsl/nir/nir_lower_phis_to_scalar.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright © 2014 Intel Corporation
>
> Possibly update your copyright date?
>
Fixed.
>
> > + *
> > + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
> obtaining a
> > + * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
> "Software"),
> > + * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without
> limitation
> > + * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute,
> sublicense,
> > + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
> > + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
> > + *
> > + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the
> next
> > + * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions
> of the
> > + * Software.
> > + *
> > + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
> EXPRESS OR
> > + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
> MERCHANTABILITY,
> > + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT
> SHALL
> > + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR
> OTHER
> > + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
> ARISING
> > + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
> DEALINGS
> > + * IN THE SOFTWARE.
> > + *
> > + * Authors:
> > + * Jason Ekstrand (jason at jlekstrand.net)
> > + *
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include "nir.h"
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Implements common subexpression elimination
> > + */
>
> Stale comment.
>
Fixed.
>
> > +struct lower_phis_to_scalar_state {
> > + void *mem_ctx;
> > + void *dead_ctx;
> > +
> > + /* Hash table marking which phi nodes are scalarizable. The key is
> > + * pointers to phi instructions and the entry is either NULL for not
> > + * scalarizable or non-null for scalarizable.
> > + */
> > + struct hash_table *phi_table;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* Determines if the given phi node should be lowered. The only phi
> nodes
> > + * we will scalarize at the moment are those where all of the sources
> are
> > + * scalarizable.
> > + */
> > +static bool
> > +should_lower_phi(nir_phi_instr *phi, struct lower_phis_to_scalar_state
> *state)
> > +{
> > + /* Already scalar */
> > + if (phi->dest.ssa.num_components == 1)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + struct hash_entry *entry = _mesa_hash_table_search(state->phi_table,
> phi);
> > + if (entry)
> > + return entry->data != NULL;
> > +
> > + nir_foreach_phi_src(phi, src) {
> > + /* Don't know what to do with non-ssa sources */
> > + if (!src->src.is_ssa)
> > + return false;
> > + nir_instr *src_instr = src->src.ssa->parent_instr;
> > + switch (src_instr->type) {
> > + case nir_instr_type_alu: {
> > + nir_alu_instr *src_alu = nir_instr_as_alu(src_instr);
> > +
> > + /* ALU operations with output_size == 0 should be scalarized.
> We
> > + * will also see a bunch of vecN operations from scalarizing
> ALU
> > + * operations and, since they can easily be copy-propagated,
> they
> > + * are ok too.
> > + */
> > + return nir_op_infos[src_alu->op].output_size == 0 ||
> > + src_alu->op != nir_op_vec2 ||
> > + src_alu->op != nir_op_vec3 ||
> > + src_alu->op != nir_op_vec4;
> > + }
> > +
> > + case nir_instr_type_phi: {
> > + nir_phi_instr *src_phi = nir_instr_as_phi(src_instr);
> > +
> > + /* Insert an entry and mark it as scalarizable for now. That
> way
> > + * we don't recurse forever and a cycle in the depencence graph
> > + * won't automatically make us fail to scalarize.
> > + */
> > + entry = _mesa_hash_table_insert(state->phi_table, src_phi,
> (void *)1);
>
> I expect "(void *)1" will give compiler warnings generally. "(void
> *)(uintptr_t)1" is the usual workaround.
>
> Useful comment, though!
>
> > + bool scalarizable = should_lower_phi(src_phi, state);
> > + entry->data = (void *)scalarizable;
>
> No need to cast to void *, since not C++.
>
I'm confused. You want more casting above but less here? Could you pleas
be a little more specific.
> > +static bool
> > +lower_phis_to_scalar_block(nir_block *block, void *void_state)
> > +{
> > + struct lower_phis_to_scalar_state *state = void_state;
> > +
> > + /* Find the last phi node in the block */
> > + nir_phi_instr *last_phi = NULL;
> > + nir_foreach_instr(block, instr) {
> > + if (instr->type != nir_instr_type_phi)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + last_phi = nir_instr_as_phi(instr);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* We have to handle the phi nodes in their own pass due to the way
> > + * we're modifying the linked list of instructions.
> > + */
> > + nir_foreach_instr_safe(block, instr) {
> > + if (instr->type != nir_instr_type_phi)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + nir_phi_instr *phi = nir_instr_as_phi(instr);
> > +
> > + if (!should_lower_phi(phi, state))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + /* Create a vecN operation to combine the results. Most of these
> > + * will be redundant, but copy propagation should clean them up
> for
> > + * us. No need to add the complexity here.
> > + */
> > + nir_op vec_op;
> > + switch (phi->dest.ssa.num_components) {
> > + case 2: vec_op = nir_op_vec2; break;
> > + case 3: vec_op = nir_op_vec3; break;
> > + case 4: vec_op = nir_op_vec4; break;
> > + default: unreachable("Invalid number of components");
> > + }
> > +
> > + nir_alu_instr *vec = nir_alu_instr_create(state->mem_ctx, vec_op);
> > + vec->dest.dest.is_ssa = true;
> > + nir_ssa_def_init(&vec->instr, &vec->dest.dest.ssa,
> > + phi->dest.ssa.num_components, NULL);
>
> nir_ssa_dest_init() instead? (throughout the file)
>
Yeah. We didn't have that when I originally wrote this pass. Updated for
the new stuff.
>
> > + vec->dest.write_mask = (1 << phi->dest.ssa.num_components) - 1;
> > +
> > + for (unsigned i = 0; i < phi->dest.ssa.num_components; i++) {
> > + nir_phi_instr *new_phi = nir_phi_instr_create(state->mem_ctx);
> > + new_phi->dest.is_ssa = true;
> > + nir_ssa_def_init(&new_phi->instr, &new_phi->dest.ssa, 1, NULL);
> > +
> > + vec->src[i].src.is_ssa = true;
> > + vec->src[i].src.ssa = &new_phi->dest.ssa;
> > +
> > + nir_foreach_phi_src(phi, src) {
> > + /* We need to insert a mov to grab the i'th component of
> src */
> > + nir_alu_instr *mov = nir_alu_instr_create(state->mem_ctx,
> > + nir_op_imov);
> > + mov->dest.dest.is_ssa = true;
> > + nir_ssa_def_init(&mov->instr, &mov->dest.dest.ssa, 1, NULL);
> > + mov->dest.write_mask = 1;
> > + mov->src[0].src = nir_src_copy(src->src, state->mem_ctx);
> > + mov->src[0].swizzle[0] = i;
> > +
> > + /* Insert at the end of the predecessor but before the jump
> */
> > + nir_instr *pred_last_instr =
> nir_block_last_instr(src->pred);
> > + if (pred_last_instr && pred_last_instr->type ==
> nir_instr_type_jump)
> > + nir_instr_insert_before(pred_last_instr, &mov->instr);
> > + else
> > + nir_instr_insert_after_block(src->pred, &mov->instr);
>
> Couldn't you just insert your mov right after the def of the src? I'm
> confused.
>
Sure
> > +
> > + nir_phi_src *new_src = ralloc(state->mem_ctx, nir_phi_src);
> > + new_src->pred = src->pred;
> > + new_src->src.is_ssa = true;
> > + new_src->src.ssa = &mov->dest.dest.ssa;
>
> new_src->src = nir_src_for_ssa(&mov->dest.dest.ssa);
> (and elsewhere in the file)
>
Again, thanks for pointing that out. I've got that fixed now.
>
> > +
> > + exec_list_push_tail(&new_phi->srcs, &new_src->node);
> > + }
> > +
> > + nir_instr_insert_before(&phi->instr, &new_phi->instr);
> > + }
> > +
> > + nir_instr_insert_after(&last_phi->instr, &vec->instr);
> > +
> > + nir_ssa_def_rewrite_uses(&phi->dest.ssa,
> > + nir_src_for_ssa(&vec->dest.dest.ssa),
> > + state->mem_ctx);
> > +
> > + ralloc_steal(state->dead_ctx, phi);
> > + nir_instr_remove(&phi->instr);
> > +
> > + /* We're using the safe iterator and inserting all the newly
> > + * scalarized phi nodes before their non-scalarized version so
> that's
> > + * ok. However, we are also inserting vec operations after all of
> > + * the last phi node so once we get here, we can't trust even the
> > + * safe iterator to stop properly. We have to break manually.
> > + */
> > + if (instr == &last_phi->instr)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +lower_phis_to_scalar_impl(nir_function_impl *impl)
> > +{
> > + struct lower_phis_to_scalar_state state;
> > +
> > + state.mem_ctx = ralloc_parent(impl);
> > + state.dead_ctx = ralloc_context(NULL);
> > + state.phi_table = _mesa_hash_table_create(state.dead_ctx,
> _mesa_hash_pointer,
> > + _mesa_key_pointer_equal);
> > +
> > + nir_foreach_block(impl, lower_phis_to_scalar_block, &state);
> > +
> > + nir_metadata_preserve(impl, nir_metadata_block_index |
> > + nir_metadata_dominance);
> > +
> > + ralloc_free(state.dead_ctx);
> > +}
>
> I just notied: When do I need to all nir_metadata_preserve()? I didn't
> in my pass.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20150126/3adbfd60/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list