[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] nir/opcodes: Use fpclassify() instead of isnormal() for ldexp
Ian Romanick
idr at freedesktop.org
Mon Jan 26 15:33:07 PST 2015
On 01/26/2015 02:22 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88806
> ---
> src/glsl/nir/nir_opcodes.py | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/glsl/nir/nir_opcodes.py b/src/glsl/nir/nir_opcodes.py
> index f54a017..3f21539 100644
> --- a/src/glsl/nir/nir_opcodes.py
> +++ b/src/glsl/nir/nir_opcodes.py
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ else
> opcode("ldexp", 0, tunsigned, [0, 0], [tfloat, tint], "", """
> dst = ldexp(src0, src1);
> /* flush denormals to zero. */
> -if (!isnormal(dst))
> +if (fpclassify(dst) != FP_NORMAL)
GCC documentation claims that isnormal is faster than fpclassify(x) ==
FP_NORMAL. Do we care?
If we care, we should provide isnormal() in macros.h.
If not,
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick at intel.com>
> dst = copysign(0.0f, src0);
> """)
>
>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list