[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 10/12] i965/fs: Reimplement emit_texture() in terms of logical send messages.
Jason Ekstrand
jason at jlekstrand.net
Wed Jul 22 09:08:37 PDT 2015
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Francisco Jerez <currojerez at riseup.net> wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net> writes:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Francisco Jerez <currojerez at riseup.net> wrote:
>>> ---
>>> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp
>>> index 89fcc49..4011639 100644
>>> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp
>>> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp
>>> @@ -861,6 +861,14 @@ fs_visitor::emit_texture(ir_texture_opcode op,
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> + if (op == ir_query_levels) {
>>> + /* textureQueryLevels() is implemented in terms of TXS so we need to
>>> + * pass a valid LOD argument.
>>> + */
>>> + assert(lod.file == BAD_FILE);
>>> + lod = fs_reg(0u);
>>
>> Why can't this go as part of the switch below? It seems kind of odd
>> to split the logic up like this.
>>
> What I had in mind originally was to factor out the switch statement
> below into a separate function -- Later on I noticed that you wanted to
> rework emit_texture() and friends to stop using ir_texture_opcode as
> representation for the texturing operation, so you would likely want to
> get rid of the whole switch-case statement below or replace it with
> something else, so I didn't bother. What are your current plans for
> emit_texture()?
At this point, we may just roll it into nir_emit_texture or we may
leave it alone. In any case, we will want to get rid of the
ir_texture_opcode eventually. Feel free to leave this patch as is. I
can merge things or whatever as needed whenever we do that refactor.
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> if (coordinate.file != BAD_FILE) {
>>> /* FINISHME: Texture coordinate rescaling doesn't work with non-constant
>>> * samplers. This should only be a problem with GL_CLAMP on Gen7.
>>> @@ -873,26 +881,50 @@ fs_visitor::emit_texture(ir_texture_opcode op,
>>> * samples, so don't worry about them.
>>> */
>>> fs_reg dst = vgrf(glsl_type::get_instance(dest_type->base_type, 4, 1));
>>> + const fs_reg srcs[] = {
>>> + coordinate, shadow_c, lod, lod2,
>>> + sample_index, mcs, sampler_reg, offset_value,
>>> + fs_reg(coord_components), fs_reg(grad_components)
>>> + };
>>> + enum opcode opcode;
>>>
>>> - if (devinfo->gen >= 7) {
>>> - inst = emit_texture_gen7(op, dst, coordinate, coord_components,
>>> - shadow_c, lod, lod2, grad_components,
>>> - sample_index, mcs, sampler_reg,
>>> - offset_value);
>>> - } else if (devinfo->gen >= 5) {
>>> - inst = emit_texture_gen5(op, dst, coordinate, coord_components,
>>> - shadow_c, lod, lod2, grad_components,
>>> - sample_index, sampler,
>>> - offset_value.file != BAD_FILE);
>>> - } else if (dispatch_width == 16) {
>>> - inst = emit_texture_gen4_simd16(op, dst, coordinate, coord_components,
>>> - shadow_c, lod, sampler);
>>> - } else {
>>> - inst = emit_texture_gen4(op, dst, coordinate, coord_components,
>>> - shadow_c, lod, lod2, grad_components,
>>> - sampler);
>>> + switch (op) {
>>> + case ir_tex:
>>> + opcode = SHADER_OPCODE_TEX_LOGICAL;
>>> + break;
>>> + case ir_txb:
>>> + opcode = FS_OPCODE_TXB_LOGICAL;
>>> + break;
>>> + case ir_txl:
>>> + opcode = SHADER_OPCODE_TXL_LOGICAL;
>>> + break;
>>> + case ir_txd:
>>> + opcode = SHADER_OPCODE_TXD_LOGICAL;
>>> + break;
>>> + case ir_txf:
>>> + opcode = SHADER_OPCODE_TXF_LOGICAL;
>>> + break;
>>> + case ir_txf_ms:
>>> + opcode = SHADER_OPCODE_TXF_CMS_LOGICAL;
>>> + break;
>>> + case ir_txs:
>>> + case ir_query_levels:
>>> + opcode = SHADER_OPCODE_TXS_LOGICAL;
>>> + break;
>>> + case ir_lod:
>>> + opcode = SHADER_OPCODE_LOD_LOGICAL;
>>> + break;
>>> + case ir_tg4:
>>> + opcode = (offset_value.file != BAD_FILE && offset_value.file != IMM ?
>>> + SHADER_OPCODE_TG4_OFFSET_LOGICAL : SHADER_OPCODE_TG4_LOGICAL);
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + unreachable("not reached");
>>
>> Please choose something more descriptive than "not reached". How
>> about "invalid texture opcode"
>
> Sure, I'll fix that, thanks.
>
>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> + inst = bld.emit(opcode, dst, srcs, ARRAY_SIZE(srcs));
>>> + inst->regs_written = 4 * dispatch_width / 8;
>>> +
>>> if (shadow_c.file != BAD_FILE)
>>> inst->shadow_compare = true;
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.4.3
>>>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list