[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 3/4] i965: Rename do_<stage>_prog to brw_<stage>_compile

[Kenneth Graunke]

On Friday, March 20, 2015 11:28:28 PM Carl Worth wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20 2015, Chris Forbes wrote:
> > I think that having both the existing `struct brw_vs_compile` and a
> > function with the same name is going to cause confusion. (same with
> > the other non-fs stages)
> 
> In an earlier version of the patch I had brw_vs_do_compile, (there is a
> "do" precedent in the code being replaced here). I could go back to that
> if it helps.
> 
> -Carl

How about brw_compile_vs_prog?  It sounds natural and doesn't appear to
conflict with anything.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20150329/2e227fef/attachment.sig>