[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 05/13] i965/vec4: one dst_reg() constructor less

[Matt Turner]

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.co.uk>
>
> Just fold the brw_type_for_base_type() and use a delegated
> constructor.
>
> Note this is a c++11 feature and the compiler will warn us if it's
> set/defaults to an earlier version of the standard.
>
> XXX: Should we just toggle c++11 on ? We seem to be using some of its
> functionality already (anonymous unions) and we could even simplify
> gallium/nouveau a bit.

I said anonymous unions were a C11 (not C++11) feature and a language
extension supported by gcc and clang. I have no idea if it's C++11 and
it's not reason to claim we're already using C++11.