[Mesa-dev] MESA_EXTENSION_OVERRIDE problem
Nanley Chery
nanleychery at gmail.com
Fri Nov 20 16:31:29 PST 2015
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Chad Versace <chad.versace at intel.com>
wrote:
> On Fri 20 Nov 2015, Nanley Chery wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Brian Paul <brian.e.paul at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Ian Romanick <idr at freedesktop.org>
> wrote:
>
> > >> I think #2 might be better, but there's a lot of churn. I don't know
> > >> that we want that much churn right around the time of the release
> branch
> > >> point, and I think it would be good to have this resolved in 11.1. I
> > >> also have a few bits of feedback in #2, so it might take a couple
> > >> iterations before that could land.
> > >>
> > >>
> > > Since 11.1 is coming up, can we go with the simpler #1 for now, then
> go to
> > > #2 after 11.1 branches?
> > >
> > >
> > I don't mind going this route. Unfortunately, I'm running into presently
> > unexplainable linker errors in the process of making the gtest for this
> > feature.
>
> Nanley, you're branch has two patches. If you remove the gtest patch
> (patch #2) from your branch, does everything work as expected? If so,
> then I think it's best to get patch #1 into
> 11.1 before the Emil creates the branchpoint, and worry about the gtest
> afterwards.
>
I've been told that most people wait 24 hours before pushing a patch that's
been given an Rb. Would it be acceptable to push it immediately given the
circumstances?
Regards,
Nanley
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20151120/9ca68acf/attachment.html>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list