[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 7/7] mesa: HACK! tweak the MAX_DEBUG_MESSAGE_LENGTH limit
Emil Velikov
emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Sun Nov 22 17:36:19 PST 2015
On 23 November 2015 at 01:15, Timothy Arceri <t_arceri at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 00:59 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 23 November 2015 at 00:35, Timothy Arceri <t_arceri at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 23:21 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> > > Based on one's interpretation of the spec one may say that length (when
>> > > non negative) either considers or doesn't the null terminator.
>> > >
>> > > I'm leaning towards the latter case, although the CTS authors are
>> > > thinking about the former.
>> >
>> > The spec says:
>> >
>> > "The lengths of all messages, including their null terminators, must
>> > be
>> > guaranteed to be less or equal to the value of the
>> > implementation-dependent constant MAX_DEBUG_MESSAGE_LENGTH."
>> >
>> So it seems that we're missing the "walk over all messages, calculate
>> and check the total length" step.
>
> No I think the spec is just badly worded. There is MAX_DEBUG_LOGGED_MESSAGES
> to limit the number of messaged so as long as a message is not longer than
> MAX_DEBUG_MESSAGE_LENGTH and there isn't more than MAX_DEBUG_LOGGED_MESSAGES
> then there should be no need to do that.
>
I guess one should have used "The length of any message, including its
null terminator" here. Then again grammar wasn't my favourite subject.
</grammar nazi>
Need to double check what CTS was doing there... so many message length tests.
-Emil
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list