[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2] nir/cf: Alter block successors before adding a fake link.
Kenneth Graunke
kenneth at whitecape.org
Wed Sep 23 10:09:00 PDT 2015
Consider the case of "while (...) { break }". Or in NIR:
block block_0 (0x7ab640):
...
/* succs: block_1 */
loop {
block block_1:
/* preds: block_0 */
break
/* succs: block_2 */
}
block block_2:
Calling nir_handle_remove_jump(block_1, nir_jump_break) will remove the break.
Unfortunately, it would mangle the predecessors and successors.
Here, block_2->predecessors->entries == 1, so we would create a fake
link, setting block_1->successors[1] = block_2, and adding block_1 to
block_2's predecessor set. This is illegal: a block cannot specify the
same successor twice. In particular, adding the predecessor would have
no effect, as it was already present in the set.
We'd then call unlink_block_successors(), which would delete the fake
link and remove block_1 from block_2's predecessor set. It would then
delete successors[0], and attempt to remove block_1 from block_2's
predecessor set a second time...except that it wouldn't be present,
triggering an assertion failure.
The fix appears to be simple: simply unlink the block's successors and
recreate them to point at the correct blocks first. Then, add the fake
link. In the above example, removing the break would cause block_1 to
have itself as a successor (as it becomes an infinite loop), so adding
the fake link won't cause a duplicate successor.
v2: Add comments (requested by Connor Abbott) and fix commit message.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Connor Abbott <cwabbott0 at gmail.com>
---
src/glsl/nir/nir_control_flow.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Here are some more comments. I also realized I never finished editing the
commit message, so there were fragments of paragraphs all over the place.
That's fixed now too. (The code is identical.)
diff --git a/src/glsl/nir/nir_control_flow.c b/src/glsl/nir/nir_control_flow.c
index 2b23f38..87bc716 100644
--- a/src/glsl/nir/nir_control_flow.c
+++ b/src/glsl/nir/nir_control_flow.c
@@ -551,31 +551,43 @@ remove_phi_src(nir_block *block, nir_block *pred)
static void
unlink_jump(nir_block *block, nir_jump_type type, bool add_normal_successors)
{
+ nir_block *next = block->successors[0];
+
if (block->successors[0])
remove_phi_src(block->successors[0], block);
if (block->successors[1])
remove_phi_src(block->successors[1], block);
- if (type == nir_jump_break) {
- nir_block *next = block->successors[0];
+ unlink_block_successors(block);
+ if (add_normal_successors)
+ block_add_normal_succs(block);
- if (next->predecessors->entries == 1) {
- nir_loop *loop =
- nir_cf_node_as_loop(nir_cf_node_prev(&next->cf_node));
+ /* If we've just removed a break, and the block we were jumping to (after
+ * the loop) now has zero predecessors, we've created a new infinite loop.
+ *
+ * NIR doesn't allow blocks (other than the start block) to have zero
+ * predecessors. In particular, dominance assumes all blocks are reachable.
+ * So, we insert a "fake link" by making successors[1] point after the loop.
+ *
+ * Note that we have to do this after unlinking/recreating the block's
+ * successors. If we removed a "break" at the end of the loop, then
+ * block == last_block, so block->successors[0] would already be "next",
+ * and adding a fake link would create two identical successors. Doing
+ * this afterward works, as we'll have changed block->successors[0] to
+ * be the top of the loop.
+ */
+ if (type == nir_jump_break && next->predecessors->entries == 0) {
+ nir_loop *loop =
+ nir_cf_node_as_loop(nir_cf_node_prev(&next->cf_node));
- /* insert fake link */
- nir_cf_node *last = nir_loop_last_cf_node(loop);
- assert(last->type == nir_cf_node_block);
- nir_block *last_block = nir_cf_node_as_block(last);
+ /* insert fake link */
+ nir_cf_node *last = nir_loop_last_cf_node(loop);
+ assert(last->type == nir_cf_node_block);
+ nir_block *last_block = nir_cf_node_as_block(last);
- last_block->successors[1] = next;
- block_add_pred(next, last_block);
- }
+ last_block->successors[1] = next;
+ block_add_pred(next, last_block);
}
-
- unlink_block_successors(block);
- if (add_normal_successors)
- block_add_normal_succs(block);
}
void
--
2.5.3
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list