[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] A couple of fixes for Tex(Sub)Image error checks

[Mark Janes]

This patch series fixes a few dEQP tests on braswell.  The rest of the
platform are unaffected, according to my tests.

deqp-gles2.functional.negative_api.texture.teximage2d_invalid_type
deqp-gles2.functional.negative_api.texture.teximage2d_invalid_internalformat
deqp-gles3.functional.negative_api.texture.teximage2d

Since the dEQP regressions listed in the bug have been found to be due
to a poorly written test, someone will need to take the action to
resolve this discrepancy with Google.  I don't expect AOSP to be the
project which can resolve this test bug.

Jason, Alex, and Kaveh: can you figure out how to address this issue?

-Mark

Eduardo Lima Mitev <elima at igalia.com> writes:

> This is a new version of the series that attempt to fix the regression reported at:
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91582
>
> The review by Jason helped me uncover the fact that the following 3 dEQP tests are buggy:
>
> dEQP-GLES2.functional.negative_api.texture.texsubimage2d_neg_offset
> dEQP-GLES2.functional.negative_api.texture.texsubimage2d_offset_allowed
> dEQP-GLES2.functional.negative_api.texture.texsubimage2d_neg_wdt_hgt
>
> So the patch split I did in the previous version of the series (v4) was actually not necessary. It was just a work-around to the failure of these tests, which this series uncovered.
>
> Now in this new version, I dropped the splitted patch and filed a bug against dEQP (together with a reference patch) to fix the above tests, which will start to fail once/if we merge this series.
>
> "[dEQP] Buggy negative API tests that check dimensions args of glTexSubImage2D" <https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=187348&thanks=187348&ts=1443083425>
>
> I filed it against the AOSP project, where dEQP package is (under external/deqp). Lets see if that was correct.
>
> Mark, in the mean time we can probably apply the patch I attached to the bug report, otherwise the regression originally reported won't go away. What do you think?
>
> Notice that first two patches has R-b from Jason already. Only the patch 3/3 is pending review.
>
> The question that remains is whether I should cc Mesa 10.6 stable too, apart from 11.0.
>
> cheers,
>
> Eduardo Lima Mitev (3):
>   mesa: Fix order of format+type and internal format checks for
>     glTexImageXD ops
>   mesa: Move _mesa_base_tex_format() from teximage to glformats files
>   mesa: Use the effective internal format instead for validation
>
>  src/mesa/main/glformats.c | 656 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  src/mesa/main/glformats.h |   2 +
>  src/mesa/main/teximage.c  | 415 ++---------------------------
>  src/mesa/main/teximage.h  |   4 -
>  4 files changed, 683 insertions(+), 394 deletions(-)
>
> -- 
> 2.4.6