[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/4] radeonsi: use CE suballocator for CP DMA realignment.
Bas Nieuwenhuizen
bas at basnieuwenhuizen.nl
Wed Apr 20 00:21:25 UTC 2016
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19.04.2016 18:29, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>
>> I retract patch 1 and 2. Large scratch buffers are nice, but the
>> hardware only supports a 32-bit offset into it.
>
>
> Do you mean patch 2 and 3? Do you plan alternative patches to error out when
> there is an integer overflow? That's still kind of important...
>
> Cheers,
> Nicolai
Really, patch 1 and 2. I did patch 1 only so I did not need to make
the wole cp_dma work with pb_buffer.
Although I guess patch 3 can best be merged with the to be written
patch that checks that the resulting size fits in 32 bit.
- Bas
>
>>
>> - Bas
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen
>> <bas at basnieuwenhuizen.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>> Use the CE suballocator instead of the normal one as the usage
>>> is most similar to the CE, i.e. only read and written on GPU
>>> and not mapped to CPU.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas at basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
>>> ---
>>> src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_cp_dma.c | 27
>>> ++++++++++-----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_cp_dma.c
>>> b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_cp_dma.c
>>> index 38e0ee6..264789d 100644
>>> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_cp_dma.c
>>> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_cp_dma.c
>>> @@ -222,31 +222,24 @@ static void si_clear_buffer(struct pipe_context
>>> *ctx, struct pipe_resource *dst,
>>> */
>>> static void si_cp_dma_realign_engine(struct si_context *sctx, unsigned
>>> size)
>>> {
>>> +
>>> uint64_t va;
>>> unsigned dma_flags = 0;
>>> unsigned scratch_size = CP_DMA_ALIGNMENT * 2;
>>> + unsigned offset;
>>> + struct r600_resource *tmp_buf;
>>>
>>> assert(size < CP_DMA_ALIGNMENT);
>>>
>>> - /* Use the scratch buffer as the dummy buffer. The 3D engine
>>> should be
>>> - * idle at this point.
>>> - */
>>> - if (!sctx->scratch_buffer ||
>>> - sctx->scratch_buffer->b.b.width0 < scratch_size) {
>>> - r600_resource_reference(&sctx->scratch_buffer, NULL);
>>> - sctx->scratch_buffer =
>>> - si_resource_create_custom(&sctx->screen->b.b,
>>> - PIPE_USAGE_DEFAULT,
>>> - scratch_size);
>>> - if (!sctx->scratch_buffer)
>>> - return;
>>> - sctx->emit_scratch_reloc = true;
>>> - }
>>> + u_suballocator_alloc(sctx->ce_suballocator, scratch_size,
>>> &offset,
>>> + (struct pipe_resource**)&tmp_buf);
>>> + if (!tmp_buf)
>>> + return;
>>>
>>> - si_cp_dma_prepare(sctx, &sctx->scratch_buffer->b.b,
>>> - &sctx->scratch_buffer->b.b, size, size,
>>> &dma_flags);
>>> + si_cp_dma_prepare(sctx, &tmp_buf->b.b,
>>> + &tmp_buf->b.b, size, size, &dma_flags);
>>>
>>> - va = sctx->scratch_buffer->gpu_address;
>>> + va = tmp_buf->gpu_address + offset;
>>> si_emit_cp_dma_copy_buffer(sctx, va, va + CP_DMA_ALIGNMENT,
>>> size,
>>> dma_flags);
>>> }
>>> --
>>> 2.8.0
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-dev mailing list
>> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>>
>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list