[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/4] st/mesa: check return value of begin/end_query
Nicolai Hähnle
nhaehnle at gmail.com
Wed Apr 20 19:37:38 UTC 2016
On 20.04.2016 11:13, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
> On 04/20/2016 05:43 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>> From: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle at amd.com>
>>
>> They can only indicate out of memory conditions, since the other error
>> conditions are caught earlier.
>> ---
>> src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_queryobj.c | 55
>> ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_queryobj.c
>> b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_queryobj.c
>> index cdb9efc..784ffde 100644
>> --- a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_queryobj.c
>> +++ b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_queryobj.c
>> @@ -61,13 +61,9 @@ st_NewQueryObject(struct gl_context *ctx, GLuint id)
>> }
>>
>>
>> -
>> static void
>> -st_DeleteQuery(struct gl_context *ctx, struct gl_query_object *q)
>> +free_queries(struct pipe_context *pipe, struct st_query_object *stq)
>> {
>> - struct pipe_context *pipe = st_context(ctx)->pipe;
>> - struct st_query_object *stq = st_query_object(q);
>> -
>> if (stq->pq) {
>> pipe->destroy_query(pipe, stq->pq);
>> stq->pq = NULL;
>> @@ -77,6 +73,16 @@ st_DeleteQuery(struct gl_context *ctx, struct
>> gl_query_object *q)
>> pipe->destroy_query(pipe, stq->pq_begin);
>> stq->pq_begin = NULL;
>> }
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> +static void
>> +st_DeleteQuery(struct gl_context *ctx, struct gl_query_object *q)
>> +{
>> + struct pipe_context *pipe = st_context(ctx)->pipe;
>> + struct st_query_object *stq = st_query_object(q);
>> +
>> + free_queries(pipe, stq);
>>
>> free(stq);
>> }
>> @@ -89,6 +95,7 @@ st_BeginQuery(struct gl_context *ctx, struct
>> gl_query_object *q)
>> struct pipe_context *pipe = st->pipe;
>> struct st_query_object *stq = st_query_object(q);
>> unsigned type;
>> + bool ret = false;
>>
>> st_flush_bitmap_cache(st_context(ctx));
>>
>> @@ -133,14 +140,7 @@ st_BeginQuery(struct gl_context *ctx, struct
>> gl_query_object *q)
>>
>> if (stq->type != type) {
>> /* free old query of different type */
>> - if (stq->pq) {
>> - pipe->destroy_query(pipe, stq->pq);
>> - stq->pq = NULL;
>> - }
>> - if (stq->pq_begin) {
>> - pipe->destroy_query(pipe, stq->pq_begin);
>> - stq->pq_begin = NULL;
>> - }
>> + free_queries(pipe, stq);
>> stq->type = PIPE_QUERY_TYPES; /* an invalid value */
>> }
>>
>> @@ -151,20 +151,25 @@ st_BeginQuery(struct gl_context *ctx, struct
>> gl_query_object *q)
>> stq->pq_begin = pipe->create_query(pipe, type, 0);
>> stq->type = type;
>> }
>> - pipe->end_query(pipe, stq->pq_begin);
>> + if (stq->pq_begin)
>> + ret = pipe->end_query(pipe, stq->pq_begin);
>> } else {
>> if (!stq->pq) {
>> stq->pq = pipe->create_query(pipe, type, q->Stream);
>> stq->type = type;
>> }
>> - if (stq->pq) {
>> - pipe->begin_query(pipe, stq->pq);
>> - }
>> - else {
>> - _mesa_error(ctx, GL_OUT_OF_MEMORY, "glBeginQuery");
>> - return;
>> - }
>> + if (stq->pq)
>> + ret = pipe->begin_query(pipe, stq->pq);
>> }
>> +
>> + if (!ret) {
>> + _mesa_error(ctx, GL_OUT_OF_MEMORY, "glBeginQuery");
>> +
>> + free_queries(pipe, stq);
>
> Why do you need to free queries now? Was there a memleak before? And why
> not in glEndQuery too?
There wasn't a memleak. The idea is that deleting objects that might be
in "weird" internal states earlier is less likely to cause problems
later on, but if you feel strongly about it I can remove it.
>> + q->Active = GL_FALSE;
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> assert(stq->type == type);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -174,6 +179,7 @@ st_EndQuery(struct gl_context *ctx, struct
>> gl_query_object *q)
>> {
>> struct pipe_context *pipe = st_context(ctx)->pipe;
>> struct st_query_object *stq = st_query_object(q);
>> + bool ret = false;
>>
>> st_flush_bitmap_cache(st_context(ctx));
>>
>> @@ -185,7 +191,12 @@ st_EndQuery(struct gl_context *ctx, struct
>> gl_query_object *q)
>> }
>>
>> if (stq->pq)
>> - pipe->end_query(pipe, stq->pq);
>> + ret = pipe->end_query(pipe, stq->pq);
>> +
>> + if (!ret) {
>> + _mesa_error(ctx, GL_OUT_OF_MEMORY, "glBeginQuery");
>
> This should be "glEndQuery", right?
Good point, I've changed it locally.
> I think it would be better to move
> the error message inside the previous branch, what do you think?
No, this is in purpose, to catch a failure of pipe->create_query above.
Nicolai
>
>> + return;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>>
>>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list