[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 4/7] i965/disasm: Split opcode tables by the generation they were introduced in.
Ian Romanick
idr at freedesktop.org
Fri Apr 29 07:44:47 UTC 2016
On 04/28/2016 09:46 PM, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Francisco Jerez <currojerez at riseup.net> wrote:
>>> ---
>>> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_disasm.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_disasm.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_disasm.c
>>> index 15d9383..0125434 100644
>>> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_disasm.c
>>> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_disasm.c
>>> @@ -30,9 +30,8 @@
>>> #include "brw_inst.h"
>>> #include "brw_eu.h"
>>>
>>> -static const struct opcode_desc opcode_descs[128] = {
>>> +static const struct opcode_desc gen4_opcode_descs[128] = {
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_MOV] = { .name = "mov", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_MOVI] = { .name = "movi", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_FRC] = { .name = "frc", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_RNDU] = { .name = "rndu", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_RNDD] = { .name = "rndd", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> @@ -40,27 +39,17 @@ static const struct opcode_desc opcode_descs[128] = {
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_RNDZ] = { .name = "rndz", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_NOT] = { .name = "not", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_LZD] = { .name = "lzd", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_F32TO16] = { .name = "f32to16", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_F16TO32] = { .name = "f16to32", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_BFREV] = { .name = "bfrev", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_FBH] = { .name = "fbh", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_FBL] = { .name = "fbl", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_CBIT] = { .name = "cbit", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>>
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_MUL] = { .name = "mul", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_MAC] = { .name = "mac", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_MACH] = { .name = "mach", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_LINE] = { .name = "line", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_PLN] = { .name = "pln", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_MAD] = { .name = "mad", .nsrc = 3, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_LRP] = { .name = "lrp", .nsrc = 3, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_SAD2] = { .name = "sad2", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_SADA2] = { .name = "sada2", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_DP4] = { .name = "dp4", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_DPH] = { .name = "dph", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_DP3] = { .name = "dp3", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_DP2] = { .name = "dp2", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_MATH] = { .name = "math", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>>
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_AVG] = { .name = "avg", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_ADD] = { .name = "add", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> @@ -73,17 +62,9 @@ static const struct opcode_desc opcode_descs[128] = {
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_ASR] = { .name = "asr", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_CMP] = { .name = "cmp", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_CMPN] = { .name = "cmpn", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_CSEL] = { .name = "csel", .nsrc = 3, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_BFE] = { .name = "bfe", .nsrc = 3, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_BFI1] = { .name = "bfi1", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_BFI2] = { .name = "bfi2", .nsrc = 3, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_ADDC] = { .name = "addc", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_SUBB] = { .name = "subb", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>>
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_SEND] = { .name = "send", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_SENDC] = { .name = "sendc", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_SENDS] = { .name = "sends", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> - [BRW_OPCODE_SENDSC] = { .name = "sendsc", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_ILLEGAL] = { .name = "illegal", .nsrc = 0, .ndst = 0 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_NOP] = { .name = "nop", .nsrc = 0, .ndst = 0 },
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_NENOP] = { .name = "nenop", .nsrc = 0, .ndst = 0 },
>>> @@ -104,6 +85,70 @@ static const struct opcode_desc opcode_descs[128] = {
>>> [BRW_OPCODE_ENDIF] = { .name = "endif", .nsrc = 0, .ndst = 0 },
>>> };
>>>
>>> +static const struct opcode_desc g45_opcode_descs[128] = {
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_MOVI] = { .name = "movi", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_PLN] = { .name = "pln", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct opcode_desc gen6_opcode_descs[128] = {
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_MATH] = { .name = "math", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_MAD] = { .name = "mad", .nsrc = 3, .ndst = 1 },
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_LRP] = { .name = "lrp", .nsrc = 3, .ndst = 1 },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct opcode_desc gen7_opcode_descs[128] = {
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_F32TO16] = { .name = "f32to16", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_F16TO32] = { .name = "f16to32", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_BFREV] = { .name = "bfrev", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_BFE] = { .name = "bfe", .nsrc = 3, .ndst = 1 },
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_BFI1] = { .name = "bfi1", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_BFI2] = { .name = "bfi2", .nsrc = 3, .ndst = 1 },
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_FBH] = { .name = "fbh", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_FBL] = { .name = "fbl", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_CBIT] = { .name = "cbit", .nsrc = 1, .ndst = 1 },
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_ADDC] = { .name = "addc", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_SUBB] = { .name = "subb", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct opcode_desc gen8_opcode_descs[128] = {
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_CSEL] = { .name = "csel", .nsrc = 3, .ndst = 1 },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct opcode_desc gen9_opcode_descs[128] = {
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_SENDS] = { .name = "sends", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>> + [BRW_OPCODE_SENDSC] = { .name = "sendsc", .nsrc = 2, .ndst = 1 },
>>
>> A 128*16-byte array for each differing generation seems really bad to
>> me, especially when they add 1-3 opcodes. A half a page for... one
>> opcode.
>>
> No, it's not, an array bounded by 128*16B for each major hardware
> generation is a tiny amount of memory by (even not so) modern standards.
> I have the suspicion you're trying to optimize prematurely, or do you
> have any evidence that your suggestion can substantially improve
> performance?
I don't think performance is the issue. I think the issue is storage
space. How does the output of 'size i965_dri.so' change from the
beginning to the end of the series?
>> Your idea to order the array by opcode (but not index by opcode) and
>> then by generation seems more appealing to me than this. Especially
>> since you could make an initial guess that the opcode you want lives
>> at opcode_desc[opcode] and start your (linear) search from there.
>>
>> For the common case (accessing an opcode that always exists) I think
>> that's actually fewer operations than searching five opcode_descs
>> arrays before finding it.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-dev mailing list
>> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20160429/3f37d172/attachment.sig>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list