[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2] vl/rbsp: add a check for emulation prevention three byte
Christian König
christian.koenig at amd.com
Tue Aug 9 14:51:29 UTC 2016
Am 09.08.2016 um 15:56 schrieb Leo Liu:
> This is the case when the "00 00 03" is very close to the beginning of
> nal unit header
>
> v2: move the check to rbsp init
>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu at amd.com>
> ---
> src/gallium/auxiliary/vl/vl_rbsp.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/vl/vl_rbsp.h b/src/gallium/auxiliary/vl/vl_rbsp.h
> index 7867238..c175e23 100644
> --- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/vl/vl_rbsp.h
> +++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/vl/vl_rbsp.h
> @@ -61,7 +61,18 @@ static inline void vl_rbsp_init(struct vl_rbsp *rbsp, struct vl_vlc *nal, unsign
> while (vl_vlc_search_byte(nal, num_bits, 0x00)) {
> if (vl_vlc_peekbits(nal, 24) == 0x000001 ||
> vl_vlc_peekbits(nal, 32) == 0x00000001) {
> + unsigned valid;
> + int i;
> +
> vl_vlc_limit(&rbsp->nal, bits_left - vl_vlc_bits_left(nal));
> + valid = vl_vlc_valid_bits(&rbsp->nal);
> + /* search for the emulation prevention three byte */
> + for (i = 24; i <= valid; i += 8) {
> + if ((vl_vlc_peekbits(&rbsp->nal, i) & 0xffffff) == 0x3) {
> + vl_vlc_removebits(&rbsp->nal, i - 8, 8);
> + i += 8;
> + }
> + }
Mhm, I think that isn't 100% correct either.
We return inside the loop only when we find the next NAL unit after the
current one, but if this is the last one that isn't the case.
> return;
I think that just replacing thing return with a break and moving the
code after the while should do the trick.
Regards,
Christian.
> }
> vl_vlc_eatbits(nal, 8);
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list