[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 18/27] i965/miptree: Add a return for updating of winsys
Ben Widawsky
ben at bwidawsk.net
Sat Dec 31 22:40:42 UTC 2016
On 16-12-10 15:39:12, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 02:09:59PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>> From: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
>>
>> There is nothing particularly useful to do currently if the update
>> fails, but there is no point carrying on either. As a result, this has a
>> behavior change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky at intel.com>
>> ---
>> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c | 14 ++++++++------
>> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c | 6 +++---
>> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c
>> index b928f94..593fa67 100644
>> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c
>> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c
>> @@ -1645,9 +1645,10 @@ intel_process_dri2_buffer(struct brw_context *brw,
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - intel_update_winsys_renderbuffer_miptree(brw, rb, bo,
>> - drawable->w, drawable->h,
>> - buffer->pitch);
>> + if (intel_update_winsys_renderbuffer_miptree(brw, rb, bo,
>> + drawable->w, drawable->h,
>> + buffer->pitch))
>> + return;
>>
>> if (_mesa_is_front_buffer_drawing(fb) &&
>> (buffer->attachment == __DRI_BUFFER_FRONT_LEFT ||
>> @@ -1703,9 +1704,10 @@ intel_update_image_buffer(struct brw_context *intel,
>> if (last_mt && last_mt->bo == buffer->bo)
>> return;
>>
>> - intel_update_winsys_renderbuffer_miptree(intel, rb, buffer->bo,
>> - buffer->width, buffer->height,
>> - buffer->pitch);
>> + if (intel_update_winsys_renderbuffer_miptree(intel, rb, buffer->bo,
>> + buffer->width, buffer->height,
>> + buffer->pitch))
>> + return;
>>
>> if (_mesa_is_front_buffer_drawing(fb) &&
>> buffer_type == __DRI_IMAGE_BUFFER_FRONT &&
>> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
>> index d002546..74db507 100644
>> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
>> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
>> @@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ intel_miptree_create_for_image(struct brw_context *intel,
>> * that will contain the actual rendering (which is lazily resolved to
>> * irb->singlesample_mt).
>> */
>> -void
>> +int
>
>We don't seem to use "zero for success"-style at least in i965. Could you
>change this to bool and flip the check earlier for consistency?
>
What do you mean by flip the check earlier?
>> intel_update_winsys_renderbuffer_miptree(struct brw_context *intel,
>> struct intel_renderbuffer *irb,
>> drm_intel_bo *bo,
>> @@ -974,12 +974,12 @@ intel_update_winsys_renderbuffer_miptree(struct brw_context *intel,
>> irb->mt = multisample_mt;
>> }
>> }
>> - return;
>> + return 0;
>>
>> fail:
>> intel_miptree_release(&irb->singlesample_mt);
>> intel_miptree_release(&irb->mt);
>> - return;
>> + return -1;
>> }
>>
>> struct intel_mipmap_tree*
>> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h
>> index 7b9a7be..85fe118 100644
>> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h
>> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h
>> @@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ intel_miptree_create_for_image(struct brw_context *intel,
>> uint32_t pitch,
>> uint32_t layout_flags);
>>
>> -void
>> +int
>> intel_update_winsys_renderbuffer_miptree(struct brw_context *intel,
>> struct intel_renderbuffer *irb,
>> drm_intel_bo *bo,
>> --
>> 2.10.2
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-dev mailing list
>> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list