[Mesa-dev] change 396cbab, configs with accumulation buffer

[Tapani Pälli]

On 02/22/2016 03:01 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/22/2016 02:27 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli at intel.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 02/22/2016 02:01 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli at intel.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Marek;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was this commit fixing some issues/problems? Why would we not expose
>>>>>> configs
>>>>>> with accumulation buffer?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> EGL doesn't support accumulation buffers.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So EGL would not expose such capability. Couldn't it then expose those
>>>> configs without any harm done?
>>>
>>>
>>> Why? Those configs are useless and redundant.
>>>
>>
>> It looks that I don't fully understand the issue here, I never used
>> accumulation buffers and most likely never will but what I wanted to
>> understand is that can these configs still be used without accumulation
>> buffer being ended up used at all? This is probably what happens as without
>> this change everything works just fine, no issues.
>>
>> If the end effect is that things work same way with or without the patch we
>> could consider reverting the change? If not, then I will just state to these
>> guys that they will need to live with a patch in their tree.
>
> I suggest they try to find out what the real issue is instead of
> working around it.
>

OK, thanks for the comments.

// Tapani