[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 3/3] i915: store reference to the context within struct intel_fence

Mauro Rossi issor.oruam at gmail.com
Sat Jul 16 00:02:58 UTC 2016


Hi,

I'm sending the v2 re-spin of patch as per i965, rechecked twice
line-by-line with Tomasz's one.

Building ok, marshmallow-x86 booting ok and here are the results of Android
CTS egl and gles2 x86 target tests

Android CTS 6.0_r7 build:2906653
07-16 00:52:42 I/DeviceManager: Detected new device 192.168.1.7:5555
cts-tf > list r
Session     Pass       Fail     Not Executed  Start time           Plan
name  Device serial(s)
0(EGL)      1410       24       0             2016.07.16_00.21.30  NA
  unknown
1(GLES2)  13832     82       0             2016.07.16_00.24.23  NA
unknown
cts-tf >

I get the same results as per i965GM

Mauro


>From d35c093d48facae4ad0d7119a8b6fdc898a6a1e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mauro Rossi <issor.oruam at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:46:09 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] i915: store reference to the context within struct
 intel_fence (v2)

Porting of the corresponding patch for i965.

Here follows the original commit message by Tomasz Figa:

"As the spec allows for {server,client}_wait_sync to be called without
currently bound context, while our implementation requires context
pointer.

v2: Add a mutex and acquire it for the duration of
    brw_fence_client_wait() and brw_fence_is_completed() as suggested
    by Chad."

NOTE: in i915 all references to 'brw' are replaced by 'intel'
---
 src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_syncobj.c | 55
++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_syncobj.c
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_syncobj.c
index 18d1546..5d37204a 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_syncobj.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_syncobj.c
@@ -46,9 +46,11 @@
 #include "intel_reg.h"

 struct intel_fence {
+   struct intel_context *intel;
    /** The fence waits for completion of this batch. */
    drm_intel_bo *batch_bo;

+   mtx_t mutex;
    bool signalled;
 };

@@ -77,7 +79,7 @@ intel_fence_insert(struct intel_context *intel, struct
intel_fence *fence)
 }

 static bool
-intel_fence_has_completed(struct intel_fence *fence)
+intel_fence_has_completed_locked(struct intel_fence *fence)
 {
    if (fence->signalled)
       return true;
@@ -92,13 +94,21 @@ intel_fence_has_completed(struct intel_fence *fence)
    return false;
 }

-/**
- * Return true if the function successfully signals or has already
signalled.
- * (This matches the behavior expected from __DRI2fence::client_wait_sync).
- */
 static bool
-intel_fence_client_wait(struct intel_context *intel, struct intel_fence
*fence,
-                      uint64_t timeout)
+intel_fence_has_completed(struct intel_fence *fence)
+{
+   bool ret;
+
+   mtx_lock(&fence->mutex);
+   ret = intel_fence_has_completed_locked(fence);
+   mtx_unlock(&fence->mutex);
+
+   return ret;
+}
+
+static bool
+intel_fence_client_wait_locked(struct intel_context *intel, struct
intel_fence *fence,
+                             uint64_t timeout)
 {
    if (fence->signalled)
       return true;
@@ -123,6 +133,23 @@ intel_fence_client_wait(struct intel_context *intel,
struct intel_fence *fence,
    return true;
 }

+/**
+ * Return true if the function successfully signals or has already
signalled.
+ * (This matches the behavior expected from __DRI2fence::client_wait_sync).
+ */
+static bool
+intel_fence_client_wait(struct intel_context *intel, struct intel_fence
*fence,
+                      uint64_t timeout)
+{
+   bool ret;
+
+   mtx_lock(&fence->mutex);
+   ret = intel_fence_client_wait_locked(intel, fence, timeout);
+   mtx_unlock(&fence->mutex);
+
+   return ret;
+}
+
 static void
 intel_fence_server_wait(struct intel_context *intel, struct intel_fence
*fence)
 {
@@ -215,6 +242,8 @@ intel_dri_create_fence(__DRIcontext *ctx)
    if (!fence)
       return NULL;

+   mtx_init(&fence->mutex, mtx_plain);
+   fence->intel = intel;
    intel_fence_insert(intel, fence);

    return fence;
@@ -233,19 +262,23 @@ static GLboolean
 intel_dri_client_wait_sync(__DRIcontext *ctx, void *driver_fence, unsigned
flags,
                            uint64_t timeout)
 {
-   struct intel_context *intel = ctx->driverPrivate;
    struct intel_fence *fence = driver_fence;

-   return intel_fence_client_wait(intel, fence, timeout);
+   return intel_fence_client_wait(fence->intel, fence, timeout);
 }

 static void
 intel_dri_server_wait_sync(__DRIcontext *ctx, void *driver_fence, unsigned
flags)
 {
-   struct intel_context *intel = ctx->driverPrivate;
    struct intel_fence *fence = driver_fence;

-   intel_fence_server_wait(intel, fence);
+   /* We might be called here with a NULL fence as a result of WaitSyncKHR
+    * on a EGL_KHR_reusable_sync fence. Nothing to do here in such case.
+    */
+   if (!fence)
+      return;
+
+   intel_fence_server_wait(fence->intel, fence);
 }

 const __DRI2fenceExtension intelFenceExtension = {
-- 
2.7.4
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20160716/75875eee/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list