[Mesa-dev] Testing patches 9987 and 9988

0xe2.0x9a.0x9b at gmail.com
Wed Jul 20 11:35:21 UTC 2016


Results for Bioshock Infinite on R9 390:

                     TIME    AVG   MIN   MAX
2016-05-25.15-51-53: 139.06, 9.81, 1.72, 58.78
2016-06-14.01-13-33: 100.91, 16.12, 3.06, 60.06
2016-07-07.16-44-55: 95.88, 18.45, 3.74, 68.32
2016-07-20.11-55-04: 85.97, 27.20, 4.54, 68.63 (git-0b626d7)
2016-07-20.12-17-38: 84.93, 27.72, 4.54, 71.60 (git-3c78d89)

This roughly shows how performance improved over time.

Mesa git-0b626d7 is just before http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/9987

Mesa git-3c78d89 is after 9987 has been merged.

The biggest performance change happened between 2016-07-07 and
2016-07-20, but I do not have enough data to tell exactly when.

---

st_validate_state() is definitely affecting performance in games as
measured by "perf stat", so I am looking forward to your rewrite.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Marek Olšák <maraeo at gmail.com> wrote:
> The first one just landed.
>
> The second one will take some time I guess.
>
> This branch contains both, but it won't be merged in this form:
> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~mareko/mesa/log/?h=si-mid-ib-gfx-fence
>
> Marek
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:53 PM, ⚛ <0xe2.0x9a.0x9b at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I would like to test http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/9987/ and
>> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/9988/ but the mbox patches
>> aren't compatible with mesa-git.
>>
>> Would it be possible to update 9987 and 9988 to match mesa-git?
>>
>> Do 9987 and 9988 assume additional public patches that need to be
>> applied prior to them?
>>
>> Thanks


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list