[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 02/27] i965/miptree: Allow get_aux_isl_surf when there is no aux surface
Pohjolainen, Topi
topi.pohjolainen at intel.com
Sun Jul 31 07:43:11 UTC 2016
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:32:33AM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 03:11:06PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > ---
> > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> > index 8c63aa6..1911eef 100644
> > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> > @@ -3204,7 +3204,8 @@ intel_miptree_get_aux_isl_surf(struct brw_context *brw,
> > } else if (mt->fast_clear_state != INTEL_FAST_CLEAR_STATE_NO_MCS) {
> > *usage = ISL_AUX_USAGE_CCS_D;
> > } else {
> > - unreachable("Invalid MCS miptree");
> > + *usage = ISL_AUX_USAGE_NONE;
>
> I'm guessing you'd like to call intel_miptree_get_aux_isl_surf()
> unconditionally in one of the following patches? After reading them quite a
> bit this is still not obvious to me, and I think some rational is needed in
> the commit message.
It looks that this is not needed until patch 13?
>
> > + return;
> > }
> >
> > /* Figure out the format and tiling of the auxiliary surface */
> > --
> > 2.5.0.400.gff86faf
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mesa-dev mailing list
> > mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list