[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 4/4] glcpp: Remove empty mid-rule action which changes test behavior.

[Kenneth Graunke]

Apparently this causes a slight difference in the parser's token
expectations, leading to a different error message.

It seems harmless, but I wanted to be cautious and separate it out.

Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
---
 src/compiler/glsl/glcpp/glcpp-parse.y                              | 2 +-
 src/compiler/glsl/glcpp/tests/129-define-non-identifier.c.expected | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/compiler/glsl/glcpp/glcpp-parse.y b/src/compiler/glsl/glcpp/glcpp-parse.y
index 1f416a1..e677811 100644
--- a/src/compiler/glsl/glcpp/glcpp-parse.y
+++ b/src/compiler/glsl/glcpp/glcpp-parse.y
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ control_line:
 ;
 
 control_line_success:
-	HASH_TOKEN DEFINE_TOKEN { } define
+	HASH_TOKEN DEFINE_TOKEN define
 |	HASH_TOKEN UNDEF IDENTIFIER NEWLINE {
 		macro_t *macro;
 		if (strcmp("__LINE__", $3) == 0
diff --git a/src/compiler/glsl/glcpp/tests/129-define-non-identifier.c.expected b/src/compiler/glsl/glcpp/tests/129-define-non-identifier.c.expected
index fd0b413..5206a5c 100644
--- a/src/compiler/glsl/glcpp/tests/129-define-non-identifier.c.expected
+++ b/src/compiler/glsl/glcpp/tests/129-define-non-identifier.c.expected
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 0:1(9): preprocessor error: #define followed by a non-identifier: 123
-0:1(9): preprocessor error: syntax error, unexpected INTEGER_STRING, expecting FUNC_IDENTIFIER or OBJ_IDENTIFIER
+0:1(9): preprocessor error: syntax error, unexpected INTEGER_STRING, expecting FUNC_IDENTIFIER or OBJ_IDENTIFIER or NEWLINE
-- 
2.7.2