[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 05/10] i965/vec4: Mark TCS_OPCODE_SRC0_010_IS_ZERO as writing the flag.
currojerez at riseup.net
Tue Mar 15 00:35:13 UTC 2016
Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Francisco Jerez <currojerez at riseup.net> wrote:
>> Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail.com> writes:
>>> Missing this causes an assertion failure in the scheduler with the next
>>> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_ir_vec4.h | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_ir_vec4.h b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_ir_vec4.h
>>> index 660beca..7cedf8e 100644
>>> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_ir_vec4.h
>>> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_ir_vec4.h
>>> @@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ public:
>>> return (conditional_mod && (opcode != BRW_OPCODE_SEL &&
>>> opcode != BRW_OPCODE_IF &&
>>> - opcode != BRW_OPCODE_WHILE));
>>> + opcode != BRW_OPCODE_WHILE)) ||
>>> + opcode == TCS_OPCODE_SRC0_010_IS_ZERO;
>> Meh... Any reason this weird instruction doesn't have the
>> conditional_mod set on creation? Having the generator set it implicitly
>> makes the instruction *less* useful and is the only reason we need to
>> introduce these hacks.
> None that I know of. I'd be happy with that fix as a replacement for this patch.
>> AFAICT the TCS_OPCODE_SRC0_010_IS_ZERO opcode is actually redundant and
>> equivalent to:
>> broadcast.nz.f0 null.xyzw, src.xxxx, 0UD
> I think there's a difference -- that broadcast instruction treats the
> two vec4 halves independently, reading a component from each of them.
> The SRC0_010_IS_ZERO reads a single component of the whole vec8 (I
> don't see calls that would set it, but that region implies it's an
> align1 instruction). Does that seem right?
broadcast is supposed to be about taking the value from a given channel
(which will be a vec4 in Align16 and a scalar in Align1) and
"broadcasting" it to all channels of the destination. In Align16 mode
and if the second source is an immediate it basically boils down to:
> brw_MOV(p, dst, stride(suboffset(src, 4 * i), 0, 4, 1));
(from brw_eu_emit.c:3365), which seems pretty close to what TCS want.
Anyway I'm fine with this patch landing as-is, this can always be
cleaned up later.
>> Do you feel like cleaning this up? Otherwise:
>> Acked-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez at riseup.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 212 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the mesa-dev