[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 11/12] glsl/rebalance_tree: Don't handle invariant or precise trees
Francisco Jerez
currojerez at riseup.net
Fri Mar 18 21:41:02 UTC 2016
Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net> writes:
> ---
> src/compiler/glsl/opt_rebalance_tree.cpp | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/compiler/glsl/opt_rebalance_tree.cpp b/src/compiler/glsl/opt_rebalance_tree.cpp
> index 095f2d7..8045d51 100644
> --- a/src/compiler/glsl/opt_rebalance_tree.cpp
> +++ b/src/compiler/glsl/opt_rebalance_tree.cpp
> @@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ public:
> progress = false;
> }
>
> + virtual ir_visitor_status visit_enter(ir_assignment *ir);
> +
> void handle_rvalue(ir_rvalue **rvalue);
>
> bool progress;
> @@ -146,6 +148,20 @@ struct is_reduction_data {
>
> } /* anonymous namespace */
>
> +ir_visitor_status
> +ir_rebalance_visitor::visit_enter(ir_assignment *ir)
> +{
> + ir_variable *var = ir->lhs->variable_referenced();
> + if (var->data.invariant || var->data.precise) {
> + /* If we're assigning to an invariant variable, just bail. Tree
> + * rebalancing (reassociation) isn't precision-safe.
> + */
> + return visit_continue_with_parent;
> + } else {
> + return visit_continue;
> + }
> +}
> +
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez at riseup.net>
> static bool
> is_reduction_operation(ir_expression_operation operation)
> {
> --
> 2.5.0.400.gff86faf
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 212 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20160318/9c30a88a/attachment.sig>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list