[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 05/12] nir/algebraic: Flag inexact optimizations
Francisco Jerez
currojerez at riseup.net
Wed Mar 23 09:07:32 UTC 2016
Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net> writes:
> Many of our optimizations, while great for cutting shaders down to size,
> aren't really precision-safe. This commit tries to flag all of the
> inexact floating-point optimizations so they don't get run on values that
> are flagged "exact". It's a bit conservative and maybe flags some safe
> optimizations as unsafe but that's better than missing one.
> ---
> src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_algebraic.py | 156 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_algebraic.py b/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_algebraic.py
> index 3e7ea06..b229f03 100644
> --- a/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_algebraic.py
> +++ b/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_algebraic.py
> @@ -61,19 +61,19 @@ optimizations = [
> (('fabs', ('fneg', a)), ('fabs', a)),
> (('iabs', ('iabs', a)), ('iabs', a)),
> (('iabs', ('ineg', a)), ('iabs', a)),
> - (('fadd', a, 0.0), a),
> + (('~fadd', a, 0.0), a),
> (('iadd', a, 0), a),
> (('usadd_4x8', a, 0), a),
> (('usadd_4x8', a, ~0), ~0),
> - (('fadd', ('fmul', a, b), ('fmul', a, c)), ('fmul', a, ('fadd', b, c))),
> + (('~fadd', ('fmul', a, b), ('fmul', a, c)), ('fmul', a, ('fadd', b, c))),
> (('iadd', ('imul', a, b), ('imul', a, c)), ('imul', a, ('iadd', b, c))),
> - (('fadd', ('fneg', a), a), 0.0),
> + (('~fadd', ('fneg', a), a), 0.0),
> (('iadd', ('ineg', a), a), 0),
> (('iadd', ('ineg', a), ('iadd', a, b)), b),
> (('iadd', a, ('iadd', ('ineg', a), b)), b),
> - (('fadd', ('fneg', a), ('fadd', a, b)), b),
> - (('fadd', a, ('fadd', ('fneg', a), b)), b),
> - (('fmul', a, 0.0), 0.0),
> + (('~fadd', ('fneg', a), ('fadd', a, b)), b),
> + (('~fadd', a, ('fadd', ('fneg', a), b)), b),
> + (('~fmul', a, 0.0), 0.0),
> (('imul', a, 0), 0),
> (('umul_unorm_4x8', a, 0), 0),
> (('umul_unorm_4x8', a, ~0), a),
> @@ -81,33 +81,33 @@ optimizations = [
> (('imul', a, 1), a),
> (('fmul', a, -1.0), ('fneg', a)),
> (('imul', a, -1), ('ineg', a)),
> - (('ffma', 0.0, a, b), b),
> - (('ffma', a, 0.0, b), b),
> - (('ffma', a, b, 0.0), ('fmul', a, b)),
> - (('ffma', a, 1.0, b), ('fadd', a, b)),
> - (('ffma', 1.0, a, b), ('fadd', a, b)),
I think 'ffma a 1 b'/'ffma 1 a b' -> 'fadd a b' could be made safe.
> - (('flrp', a, b, 0.0), a),
> - (('flrp', a, b, 1.0), b),
> - (('flrp', a, a, b), a),
> - (('flrp', 0.0, a, b), ('fmul', a, b)),
> + (('~ffma', 0.0, a, b), b),
> + (('~ffma', a, 0.0, b), b),
> + (('~ffma', a, b, 0.0), ('fmul', a, b)),
> + (('~ffma', a, 1.0, b), ('fadd', a, b)),
> + (('~ffma', 1.0, a, b), ('fadd', a, b)),
> + (('~flrp', a, b, 0.0), a),
> + (('~flrp', a, b, 1.0), b),
> + (('~flrp', a, a, b), a),
> + (('~flrp', 0.0, a, b), ('fmul', a, b)),
> (('flrp', a, b, c), ('fadd', ('fmul', c, ('fsub', b, a)), a), 'options->lower_flrp'),
> (('ffract', a), ('fsub', a, ('ffloor', a)), 'options->lower_ffract'),
> - (('fadd', ('fmul', a, ('fadd', 1.0, ('fneg', c))), ('fmul', b, c)), ('flrp', a, b, c), '!options->lower_flrp'),
> - (('fadd', a, ('fmul', c, ('fadd', b, ('fneg', a)))), ('flrp', a, b, c), '!options->lower_flrp'),
> + (('~fadd', ('fmul', a, ('fadd', 1.0, ('fneg', c))), ('fmul', b, c)), ('flrp', a, b, c), '!options->lower_flrp'),
> + (('~fadd', a, ('fmul', c, ('fadd', b, ('fneg', a)))), ('flrp', a, b, c), '!options->lower_flrp'),
> (('ffma', a, b, c), ('fadd', ('fmul', a, b), c), 'options->lower_ffma'),
> - (('fadd', ('fmul', a, b), c), ('ffma', a, b, c), '!options->lower_ffma'),
> + (('~fadd', ('fmul', a, b), c), ('ffma', a, b, c), '!options->lower_ffma'),
> # Comparison simplifications
> - (('inot', ('flt', a, b)), ('fge', a, b)),
> - (('inot', ('fge', a, b)), ('flt', a, b)),
> - (('inot', ('feq', a, b)), ('fne', a, b)),
> - (('inot', ('fne', a, b)), ('feq', a, b)),
> - (('inot', ('ilt', a, b)), ('ige', a, b)),
> - (('inot', ('ige', a, b)), ('ilt', a, b)),
> - (('inot', ('ieq', a, b)), ('ine', a, b)),
> - (('inot', ('ine', a, b)), ('ieq', a, b)),
What's unsafe about the four integer comparison simplifications above?
> - (('fge', ('fneg', ('fabs', a)), 0.0), ('feq', a, 0.0)),
This one seems mostly safe too.
> - (('bcsel', ('flt', a, b), a, b), ('fmin', a, b)),
> - (('bcsel', ('flt', a, b), b, a), ('fmax', a, b)),
What are the semantics of fmin/fmax? Are they defined as in GLSL with
min(NaN, x) = NaN, min(x, NaN) = x? Or the other way around? Or is it
defined to be commutative? In the first case the code above would
indeed be unsafe *but* the related simplification:
| (('bcsel', ('flt', a, b), a, b), ('fmin', b, a)),
| (('bcsel', ('flt', a, b), b, a), ('fmax', a, b)),
would be completely safe.
> + (('~inot', ('flt', a, b)), ('fge', a, b)),
> + (('~inot', ('fge', a, b)), ('flt', a, b)),
> + (('~inot', ('feq', a, b)), ('fne', a, b)),
> + (('~inot', ('fne', a, b)), ('feq', a, b)),
> + (('~inot', ('ilt', a, b)), ('ige', a, b)),
> + (('~inot', ('ige', a, b)), ('ilt', a, b)),
> + (('~inot', ('ieq', a, b)), ('ine', a, b)),
> + (('~inot', ('ine', a, b)), ('ieq', a, b)),
> + (('~fge', ('fneg', ('fabs', a)), 0.0), ('feq', a, 0.0)),
> + (('~bcsel', ('flt', a, b), a, b), ('fmin', a, b)),
> + (('~bcsel', ('flt', a, b), b, a), ('fmax', a, b)),
> (('bcsel', ('inot', 'a at bool'), b, c), ('bcsel', a, c, b)),
> (('bcsel', a, ('bcsel', a, b, c), d), ('bcsel', a, b, d)),
> (('fmin', a, a), a),
> @@ -116,17 +116,17 @@ optimizations = [
> (('imax', a, a), a),
> (('umin', a, a), a),
> (('umax', a, a), a),
> - (('fmin', ('fmax', a, 0.0), 1.0), ('fsat', a), '!options->lower_fsat'),
> - (('fmax', ('fmin', a, 1.0), 0.0), ('fsat', a), '!options->lower_fsat'),
> + (('~fmin', ('fmax', a, 0.0), 1.0), ('fsat', a), '!options->lower_fsat'),
> + (('~fmax', ('fmin', a, 1.0), 0.0), ('fsat', a), '!options->lower_fsat'),
> (('fsat', a), ('fmin', ('fmax', a, 0.0), 1.0), 'options->lower_fsat'),
> (('fsat', ('fsat', a)), ('fsat', a)),
> - (('fsat', ('fmin', a, 1.0)), ('fsat', a)),
> - (('fsat', ('fmax', a, 0.0)), ('fsat', a)),
> + (('~fsat', ('fmin', a, 1.0)), ('fsat', a)),
> + (('~fsat', ('fmax', a, 0.0)), ('fsat', a)),
> (('fmin', ('fmax', ('fmin', ('fmax', a, 0.0), 1.0), 0.0), 1.0), ('fmin', ('fmax', a, 0.0), 1.0)),
> - (('ior', ('flt', a, b), ('flt', a, c)), ('flt', a, ('fmax', b, c))),
> - (('ior', ('flt', a, c), ('flt', b, c)), ('flt', ('fmin', a, b), c)),
> - (('ior', ('fge', a, b), ('fge', a, c)), ('fge', a, ('fmin', b, c))),
> - (('ior', ('fge', a, c), ('fge', b, c)), ('fge', ('fmax', a, b), c)),
These would be safe if fmin/fmax were commutative, which I don't think
is the case?
> + (('~ior', ('flt', a, b), ('flt', a, c)), ('flt', a, ('fmax', b, c))),
> + (('~ior', ('flt', a, c), ('flt', b, c)), ('flt', ('fmin', a, b), c)),
> + (('~ior', ('fge', a, b), ('fge', a, c)), ('fge', a, ('fmin', b, c))),
> + (('~ior', ('fge', a, c), ('fge', b, c)), ('fge', ('fmax', a, b), c)),
> (('slt', a, b), ('b2f', ('flt', a, b)), 'options->lower_scmp'),
> (('sge', a, b), ('b2f', ('fge', a, b)), 'options->lower_scmp'),
> (('seq', a, b), ('b2f', ('feq', a, b)), 'options->lower_scmp'),
> @@ -150,15 +150,15 @@ optimizations = [
> (('ult', a, a), False),
> (('uge', a, a), True),
> # Logical and bit operations
> - (('fand', a, 0.0), 0.0),
> + (('~fand', a, 0.0), 0.0),
This is safe if fand(x, y) is defined as (x != 0 && y != 0 ? 1 : 0).
Could you remind me how it is defined?
> (('iand', a, a), a),
> (('iand', a, ~0), a),
> (('iand', a, 0), 0),
> (('ior', a, a), a),
> (('ior', a, 0), a),
> - (('fxor', a, a), 0.0),
> + (('~fxor', a, a), 0.0),
Same goes here.
> (('ixor', a, a), 0),
> - (('fxor', a, 0.0), a),
> + (('~fxor', a, 0.0), a),
> (('ixor', a, 0), a),
> (('inot', ('inot', a)), a),
> # DeMorgan's Laws
> @@ -174,35 +174,35 @@ optimizations = [
> (('iand', 0xff, ('ushr', a, 24)), ('ushr', a, 24)),
> (('iand', 0xffff, ('ushr', a, 16)), ('ushr', a, 16)),
> # Exponential/logarithmic identities
> - (('fexp2', ('flog2', a)), a), # 2^lg2(a) = a
> - (('flog2', ('fexp2', a)), a), # lg2(2^a) = a
> + (('~fexp2', ('flog2', a)), a), # 2^lg2(a) = a
> + (('~flog2', ('fexp2', a)), a), # lg2(2^a) = a
> (('fpow', a, b), ('fexp2', ('fmul', ('flog2', a), b)), 'options->lower_fpow'), # a^b = 2^(lg2(a)*b)
> - (('fexp2', ('fmul', ('flog2', a), b)), ('fpow', a, b), '!options->lower_fpow'), # 2^(lg2(a)*b) = a^b
> - (('fexp2', ('fadd', ('fmul', ('flog2', a), b), ('fmul', ('flog2', c), d))),
> - ('fmul', ('fpow', a, b), ('fpow', c, d)), '!options->lower_fpow'), # 2^(lg2(a) * b + lg2(c) + d) = a^b * c^d
> - (('fpow', a, 1.0), a),
> - (('fpow', a, 2.0), ('fmul', a, a)),
> - (('fpow', a, 4.0), ('fmul', ('fmul', a, a), ('fmul', a, a))),
> - (('fpow', 2.0, a), ('fexp2', a)),
> - (('fpow', ('fpow', a, 2.2), 0.454545), a),
> - (('fpow', ('fabs', ('fpow', a, 2.2)), 0.454545), ('fabs', a)),
> - (('fsqrt', ('fexp2', a)), ('fexp2', ('fmul', 0.5, a))),
> - (('frcp', ('fexp2', a)), ('fexp2', ('fneg', a))),
> - (('frsq', ('fexp2', a)), ('fexp2', ('fmul', -0.5, a))),
> - (('flog2', ('fsqrt', a)), ('fmul', 0.5, ('flog2', a))),
> - (('flog2', ('frcp', a)), ('fneg', ('flog2', a))),
> - (('flog2', ('frsq', a)), ('fmul', -0.5, ('flog2', a))),
> - (('flog2', ('fpow', a, b)), ('fmul', b, ('flog2', a))),
> - (('fadd', ('flog2', a), ('flog2', b)), ('flog2', ('fmul', a, b))),
> - (('fadd', ('flog2', a), ('fneg', ('flog2', b))), ('flog2', ('fdiv', a, b))),
> - (('fmul', ('fexp2', a), ('fexp2', b)), ('fexp2', ('fadd', a, b))),
> + (('~fexp2', ('fmul', ('flog2', a), b)), ('fpow', a, b), '!options->lower_fpow'), # 2^(lg2(a)*b) = a^b
> + (('~fexp2', ('fadd', ('fmul', ('flog2', a), b), ('fmul', ('flog2', c), d))),
> + ('~fmul', ('fpow', a, b), ('fpow', c, d)), '!options->lower_fpow'), # 2^(lg2(a) * b + lg2(c) + d) = a^b * c^d
> + (('~fpow', a, 1.0), a),
> + (('~fpow', a, 2.0), ('fmul', a, a)),
> + (('~fpow', a, 4.0), ('fmul', ('fmul', a, a), ('fmul', a, a))),
> + (('~fpow', 2.0, a), ('fexp2', a)),
> + (('~fpow', ('fpow', a, 2.2), 0.454545), a),
> + (('~fpow', ('fabs', ('fpow', a, 2.2)), 0.454545), ('fabs', a)),
> + (('~fsqrt', ('fexp2', a)), ('fexp2', ('fmul', 0.5, a))),
> + (('~frcp', ('fexp2', a)), ('fexp2', ('fneg', a))),
> + (('~frsq', ('fexp2', a)), ('fexp2', ('fmul', -0.5, a))),
> + (('~flog2', ('fsqrt', a)), ('fmul', 0.5, ('flog2', a))),
> + (('~flog2', ('frcp', a)), ('fneg', ('flog2', a))),
> + (('~flog2', ('frsq', a)), ('fmul', -0.5, ('flog2', a))),
> + (('~flog2', ('fpow', a, b)), ('fmul', b, ('flog2', a))),
> + (('~fadd', ('flog2', a), ('flog2', b)), ('flog2', ('fmul', a, b))),
> + (('~fadd', ('flog2', a), ('fneg', ('flog2', b))), ('flog2', ('fdiv', a, b))),
> + (('~fmul', ('fexp2', a), ('fexp2', b)), ('fexp2', ('fadd', a, b))),
> # Division and reciprocal
> - (('fdiv', 1.0, a), ('frcp', a)),
> - (('fdiv', a, b), ('fmul', a, ('frcp', b)), 'options->lower_fdiv'),
This one is safe and I guess necessary if the back-end requires fdiv to
be lowered?
> - (('frcp', ('frcp', a)), a),
> - (('frcp', ('fsqrt', a)), ('frsq', a)),
> - (('fsqrt', a), ('frcp', ('frsq', a)), 'options->lower_fsqrt'),
Same here.
> - (('frcp', ('frsq', a)), ('fsqrt', a), '!options->lower_fsqrt'),
> + (('~fdiv', 1.0, a), ('frcp', a)),
> + (('~fdiv', a, b), ('fmul', a, ('frcp', b)), 'options->lower_fdiv'),
> + (('~frcp', ('frcp', a)), a),
> + (('~frcp', ('fsqrt', a)), ('frsq', a)),
> + (('~fsqrt', a), ('frcp', ('frsq', a)), 'options->lower_fsqrt'),
> + (('~frcp', ('frsq', a)), ('fsqrt', a), '!options->lower_fsqrt'),
> # Boolean simplifications
> (('ieq', 'a at bool', True), a),
> (('ine', 'a at bool', True), ('inot', a)),
> @@ -221,8 +221,8 @@ optimizations = [
>
> # Conversions
> (('i2b', ('b2i', a)), a),
> - (('f2i', ('ftrunc', a)), ('f2i', a)),
> - (('f2u', ('ftrunc', a)), ('f2u', a)),
> + (('~f2i', ('ftrunc', a)), ('f2i', a)),
> + (('~f2u', ('ftrunc', a)), ('f2u', a)),
>
These seem safe to me.
> # Byte extraction
> (('ushr', a, 24), ('extract_u8', a, 3), '!options->lower_extract_byte'),
> @@ -235,17 +235,17 @@ optimizations = [
> (('iand', 0xffff, a), ('extract_u16', a, 0), '!options->lower_extract_word'),
>
> # Subtracts
> - (('fsub', a, ('fsub', 0.0, b)), ('fadd', a, b)),
> + (('~fsub', a, ('fsub', 0.0, b)), ('fadd', a, b)),
> (('isub', a, ('isub', 0, b)), ('iadd', a, b)),
> (('ussub_4x8', a, 0), a),
> (('ussub_4x8', a, ~0), 0),
> - (('fsub', a, b), ('fadd', a, ('fneg', b)), 'options->lower_sub'),
> + (('~fsub', a, b), ('fadd', a, ('fneg', b)), 'options->lower_sub'),
Required for lowering.
> (('isub', a, b), ('iadd', a, ('ineg', b)), 'options->lower_sub'),
> - (('fneg', a), ('fsub', 0.0, a), 'options->lower_negate'),
> + (('~fneg', a), ('fsub', 0.0, a), 'options->lower_negate'),
Same here.
> (('ineg', a), ('isub', 0, a), 'options->lower_negate'),
> - (('fadd', a, ('fsub', 0.0, b)), ('fsub', a, b)),
> + (('~fadd', a, ('fsub', 0.0, b)), ('fsub', a, b)),
> (('iadd', a, ('isub', 0, b)), ('isub', a, b)),
> - (('fabs', ('fsub', 0.0, a)), ('fabs', a)),
> + (('~fabs', ('fsub', 0.0, a)), ('fabs', a)),
This one seems safe.
> (('iabs', ('isub', 0, a)), ('iabs', a)),
>
> # Misc. lowering
> @@ -372,10 +372,10 @@ for op in ['flt', 'fge', 'feq', 'fne',
> # they help code generation but do not necessarily produce code that is
> # more easily optimizable.
> late_optimizations = [
> - (('flt', ('fadd', a, b), 0.0), ('flt', a, ('fneg', b))),
This one also seems safe,
> - (('fge', ('fadd', a, b), 0.0), ('fge', a, ('fneg', b))),
> - (('feq', ('fadd', a, b), 0.0), ('feq', a, ('fneg', b))),
> - (('fne', ('fadd', a, b), 0.0), ('fne', a, ('fneg', b))),
...but these other ones are indeed unsafe for some sign combinations of
a and b when they are not finite.
> + (('~flt', ('fadd', a, b), 0.0), ('flt', a, ('fneg', b))),
> + (('~fge', ('fadd', a, b), 0.0), ('fge', a, ('fneg', b))),
> + (('~feq', ('fadd', a, b), 0.0), ('feq', a, ('fneg', b))),
> + (('~fne', ('fadd', a, b), 0.0), ('fne', a, ('fneg', b))),
> (('fdot2', a, b), ('fdot_replicated2', a, b), 'options->fdot_replicates'),
> (('fdot3', a, b), ('fdot_replicated3', a, b), 'options->fdot_replicates'),
> (('fdot4', a, b), ('fdot_replicated4', a, b), 'options->fdot_replicates'),
I've also looked through the remaining algebraic optimizations in this
pass, and things look safe except for the ones you have already marked
unsafe in this patch -- I'll wait until you answer the questions I
pointed out before I send you a R-b for it though.
> --
> 2.5.0.400.gff86faf
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 212 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20160323/bf138477/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list