[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] nir/search: Don't match inexact expressions with exact subexpressions
Jason Ekstrand
jason at jlekstrand.net
Mon Mar 28 23:54:57 UTC 2016
In the first pass of implementing exact handling, I made a mistake with
search-and-replace. In particular, we only reallly handled exact/inexact
on the root of the tree. Instead, we need to check every node in the tree
for an exact/inexact match. As an example of this, consider the following
GLSL code
precise float a = b + c;
if (a < 0) {
do_stuff();
}
In that case, only the add will be declared "exact" and an expression that
looks for "b + c < 0" will still match and replace it with "b < -c" which
may yield different results. The solution is to simply bail if any of the
values are exact when matching an inexact expression.
---
src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c b/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c
index 6e63063..b915101 100644
--- a/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c
+++ b/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
#include "nir_search.h"
struct match_state {
+ bool inexact_match;
+ bool has_exact_alu;
unsigned variables_seen;
nir_alu_src variables[NIR_SEARCH_MAX_VARIABLES];
};
@@ -239,7 +241,10 @@ match_expression(const nir_search_expression *expr, nir_alu_instr *instr,
return false;
assert(instr->dest.dest.is_ssa);
- if (expr->inexact && instr->exact)
+
+ state->inexact_match = expr->inexact || state->inexact_match;
+ state->has_exact_alu = instr->exact || state->has_exact_alu;
+ if (state->inexact_match && state->has_exact_alu)
return false;
assert(!instr->dest.saturate);
@@ -410,7 +415,7 @@ bitsize_tree_filter_down(bitsize_tree *tree, unsigned size)
static nir_alu_src
construct_value(const nir_search_value *value,
- unsigned num_components, bitsize_tree *bitsize, bool exact,
+ unsigned num_components, bitsize_tree *bitsize,
struct match_state *state,
nir_instr *instr, void *mem_ctx)
{
@@ -424,10 +429,16 @@ construct_value(const nir_search_value *value,
nir_alu_instr *alu = nir_alu_instr_create(mem_ctx, expr->opcode);
nir_ssa_dest_init(&alu->instr, &alu->dest.dest, num_components,
bitsize->dest_size, NULL);
- alu->exact = exact;
alu->dest.write_mask = (1 << num_components) - 1;
alu->dest.saturate = false;
+ /* We have no way of knowing what values in a given search expression
+ * map to a particular replacement value. Therefore, if the
+ * expression we are replacing has any exact values, the entire
+ * replacement should be exact.
+ */
+ alu->exact = state->has_exact_alu;
+
for (unsigned i = 0; i < nir_op_infos[expr->opcode].num_inputs; i++) {
/* If the source is an explicitly sized source, then we need to reset
* the number of components to match.
@@ -436,7 +447,7 @@ construct_value(const nir_search_value *value,
num_components = nir_op_infos[alu->op].input_sizes[i];
alu->src[i] = construct_value(expr->srcs[i],
- num_components, bitsize->srcs[i], exact,
+ num_components, bitsize->srcs[i],
state, instr, mem_ctx);
}
@@ -546,6 +557,8 @@ nir_replace_instr(nir_alu_instr *instr, const nir_search_expression *search,
assert(instr->dest.dest.is_ssa);
struct match_state state;
+ state.inexact_match = false;
+ state.has_exact_alu = false;
state.variables_seen = 0;
if (!match_expression(search, instr, instr->dest.dest.ssa.num_components,
@@ -569,7 +582,7 @@ nir_replace_instr(nir_alu_instr *instr, const nir_search_expression *search,
mov->src[0] = construct_value(replace,
instr->dest.dest.ssa.num_components, tree,
- instr->exact, &state, &instr->instr, mem_ctx);
+ &state, &instr->instr, mem_ctx);
nir_instr_insert_before(&instr->instr, &mov->instr);
nir_ssa_def_rewrite_uses(&instr->dest.dest.ssa,
--
2.5.0.400.gff86faf
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list