[Mesa-dev] [RFC] add MAINTAINERS and get_maintainer.pl script
michel at daenzer.net
Mon May 2 06:15:19 UTC 2016
On 25.04.2016 21:36, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On 20 April 2016 at 00:32, Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Let's let people add themselves to the file if they want. No point in
>>> trying to populate it up front.
>> yeah, I expect people to add themselves, and for the MAINTAINERS file
>> to evolve over time.. if people like the idea I'll send a non-rfc
>> version of the patch which whatever entries people ask me to add
>> themselves for over the next week or so.. mostly just to avoid
>> starting off with a completely empty file. But wasn't planning to
>> wait for it to be completely populated to start with.
> If you want a bit more to add:
> WAYLAND EGL SUPPORT
> R: Daniel Stone <daniels at collabora.com>
> F: src/egl/wayland/*
> F: src/egl/drivers/dri2/platform_wayland.c
So, what is this based on? Maybe I'm not looking in the right place, but
out of hundreds of changes in Git touching those files, I see one change
from you about six months ago and five changes with a Reviewed-by: tag
from you over a year ago. You didn't push any changes other than your
own either AFAICT.
Looking at all of Mesa yields a similar picture; that is why I
previously questioned your authority to NAK patches in Mesa.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not questioning your authority on all things
Wayland. Your review of Wayland related patches obviously carries a lot
of weight. But I'd expect to see a very different footprint in the Git
history from somebody who calls himself maintainer.
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
More information about the mesa-dev