[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Revert "i965: Always use Y-tiled buffers on SKL+"

Matt Turner mattst88 at gmail.com
Mon May 9 18:36:13 UTC 2016

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> On 8 May 2016 at 20:05, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 12:15:00PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>>> I'd already suggested the same, but it never got pushed:
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2016-May/115501.html
>>> So I guess we can add the Tested-by from the other, for whichever gets
>>> pushed.
>> Was there a reason you didn't push it yet?
> Was just waiting for something a bit stronger than an ack, I guess?

An "Acked-by" from the author of the reverted commit seems as strong
as can be had. The concept of giving a "Reviewed-by" for a revert
seems a bit absurd to me.

More information about the mesa-dev mailing list