[Mesa-dev] [Bug 95431] [llvmpipe] [softpipe] piglit layout-location-named-block regression

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Mon May 16 16:57:47 UTC 2016


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95431

            Bug ID: 95431
           Summary: [llvmpipe] [softpipe] piglit
                    layout-location-named-block regression
           Product: Mesa
           Version: git
          Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
                OS: Linux (All)
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: bisected, regression
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: Mesa core
          Assignee: mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
          Reporter: vlee at freedesktop.org
        QA Contact: mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
                CC: anuj.phogat at gmail.com, eocallaghan at auroraux.org,
                    kenneth at whitecape.org, t_arceri at yahoo.com.au

mesa: 71465179fc45820dabf933146fb16f044a7363d7 (master 11.3.0-devel)

$ ./bin/shader_runner
tests/spec/arb_separate_shader_objects/execution/layout-location-named-block.shader_test
-auto
Failed to link:
error: fragment shader input `name2' with explicit location has no matching
output
error: fragment shader input `name' with explicit location has no matching
output

PIGLIT: {"result": "fail" }


0d88b15f073d09afed1747d9cdde98f15c7aa28d is the first bad commit
commit 0d88b15f073d09afed1747d9cdde98f15c7aa28d
Author: Timothy Arceri <timothy.arceri at collabora.com>
Date:   Thu Dec 17 11:34:09 2015 +1100

    glsl: cross validate varyings with a component qualifier

    This change checks for component overlap, including handling overlap of
    locations and components by doubles. Previously there was no validation
    for assigning explicit locations to a location used by the second half
    of a double.

    V3: simplify handling of doubles and fix double component aliasing
    detection

    V2: fix component matching for matricies

    Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat at gmail.com>
    Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan at alterapraxis.com>
    Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>

:040000 040000 768b158147123bb257d8b61364c297c17e9c4a9b
14114ec9e96bfc1c4561b0af01ae26be79587c94 M      src
bisect run success

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20160516/bf0b2d70/attachment.html>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list