[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965/fs: Fix off-by-one region overlap comparison in copy propagation.

[Francisco Jerez]

This was introduced in cf375a3333e54a01462f192202d609436e5fbec8 but
the blame is mine because the pseudocode I sent in my review comment
for the original patch suggesting to do things this way already had
the off-by-one error.  This may have caused copy propagation to be
unnecessarily strict while checking whether VGRF writes interfere with
any ACP entries and possibly miss valid optimization opportunities in
cases where multiple copy instructions write sequential locations of
the same VGRF.

Cc: Iago Toral Quiroga <itoral at igalia.com>
Cc: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias at igalia.com>
---
 src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_copy_propagation.cpp | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_copy_propagation.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_copy_propagation.cpp
index b667b8c..eb5c00d 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_copy_propagation.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_copy_propagation.cpp
@@ -756,8 +756,8 @@ inline bool
 regions_overlap(const fs_reg &r, unsigned n, const fs_reg &s, unsigned m)
 {
    return r.file == s.file && r.nr == s.nr &&
-      !(r.reg_offset + n < s.reg_offset ||
-        s.reg_offset + m < r.reg_offset);
+      !(r.reg_offset + n <= s.reg_offset ||
+        s.reg_offset + m <= r.reg_offset);
 }
 
 /* Walks a basic block and does copy propagation on it using the acp
-- 
2.7.3