[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] nv50/ir: restructure postraconstantfolding pass
Karol Herbst
karolherbst at gmail.com
Sun Oct 9 09:04:54 UTC 2016
we might want to add more folding passes here, so make it a bit more generic
v2: leave the comment and reword commit message
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <karolherbst at gmail.com>
---
.../drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp | 120 +++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp
index fd1fec6..1f47ba2 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp
@@ -2956,75 +2956,79 @@ FlatteningPass::tryPredicateConditional(BasicBlock *bb)
// constraint SDST == SSRC2
// TODO:
// Does NVC0+ have other situations where this pass makes sense?
-class NV50PostRaConstantFolding : public Pass
+class PostRaConstantFolding : public Pass
{
private:
- virtual bool visit(BasicBlock *);
+ virtual bool visit(Instruction *);
+ void handleMAD(Instruction *);
};
-bool
-NV50PostRaConstantFolding::visit(BasicBlock *bb)
+// Fold Immediate into MAD; must be done after register allocation due to
+// constraint SDST == SSRC2
+void
+PostRaConstantFolding::handleMAD(Instruction *i)
{
- Value *vtmp;
- Instruction *def;
-
- for (Instruction *i = bb->getFirst(); i; i = i->next) {
- switch (i->op) {
- case OP_MAD:
- if (i->def(0).getFile() != FILE_GPR ||
- i->src(0).getFile() != FILE_GPR ||
- i->src(1).getFile() != FILE_GPR ||
- i->src(2).getFile() != FILE_GPR ||
- i->getDef(0)->reg.data.id != i->getSrc(2)->reg.data.id)
- break;
-
- if (i->getDef(0)->reg.data.id >= 64 ||
- i->getSrc(0)->reg.data.id >= 64)
- break;
+ if (i->def(0).getFile() != FILE_GPR ||
+ i->src(0).getFile() != FILE_GPR ||
+ i->src(1).getFile() != FILE_GPR ||
+ i->src(2).getFile() != FILE_GPR ||
+ i->getDef(0)->reg.data.id != i->getSrc(2)->reg.data.id)
+ return;
- if (i->flagsSrc >= 0 && i->getSrc(i->flagsSrc)->reg.data.id != 0)
- break;
+ if (i->getDef(0)->reg.data.id >= 64 ||
+ i->getSrc(0)->reg.data.id >= 64)
+ return;
- if (i->getPredicate())
- break;
+ if (i->flagsSrc >= 0 && i->getSrc(i->flagsSrc)->reg.data.id != 0)
+ return;
- def = i->getSrc(1)->getInsn();
- if (def && def->op == OP_SPLIT && typeSizeof(def->sType) == 4)
- def = def->getSrc(0)->getInsn();
- if (def && def->op == OP_MOV && def->src(0).getFile() == FILE_IMMEDIATE) {
- vtmp = i->getSrc(1);
- if (isFloatType(i->sType)) {
- i->setSrc(1, def->getSrc(0));
- } else {
- ImmediateValue val;
- bool ret = def->src(0).getImmediate(val);
- assert(ret);
- if (i->getSrc(1)->reg.data.id & 1)
- val.reg.data.u32 >>= 16;
- val.reg.data.u32 &= 0xffff;
- i->setSrc(1, new_ImmediateValue(bb->getProgram(), val.reg.data.u32));
- }
+ if (i->getPredicate())
+ return;
- /* There's no post-RA dead code elimination, so do it here
- * XXX: if we add more code-removing post-RA passes, we might
- * want to create a post-RA dead-code elim pass */
- if (vtmp->getInsn()->isDead(true)) {
- Value *src = vtmp->getInsn()->getSrc(0);
- // Careful -- splits will have already been removed from the
- // functions. Don't double-delete.
- if (vtmp->getInsn()->bb)
- delete_Instruction(prog, vtmp->getInsn());
- if (src->getInsn() && src->getInsn()->isDead(true))
- delete_Instruction(prog, src->getInsn());
- }
+ Value *vtmp;
+ Instruction *def = i->getSrc(1)->getInsn();
+
+ if (def && def->op == OP_SPLIT && typeSizeof(def->sType) == 4)
+ def = def->getSrc(0)->getInsn();
+ if (def && def->op == OP_MOV && def->src(0).getFile() == FILE_IMMEDIATE) {
+ vtmp = i->getSrc(1);
+ if (isFloatType(i->sType)) {
+ i->setSrc(1, def->getSrc(0));
+ } else {
+ ImmediateValue val;
+ bool ret = def->src(0).getImmediate(val);
+ assert(ret);
+ if (i->getSrc(1)->reg.data.id & 1)
+ val.reg.data.u32 >>= 16;
+ val.reg.data.u32 &= 0xffff;
+ i->setSrc(1, new_ImmediateValue(prog, val.reg.data.u32));
+ }
- break;
- }
- break;
- default:
- break;
+ /* There's no post-RA dead code elimination, so do it here
+ * XXX: if we add more code-removing post-RA passes, we might
+ * want to create a post-RA dead-code elim pass */
+ if (vtmp->getInsn()->isDead(true)) {
+ Value *src = vtmp->getInsn()->getSrc(0);
+ // Careful -- splits will have already been removed from the
+ // functions. Don't double-delete.
+ if (vtmp->getInsn()->bb)
+ delete_Instruction(prog, vtmp->getInsn());
+ if (src->getInsn() && src->getInsn()->isDead(true))
+ delete_Instruction(prog, src->getInsn());
}
}
+}
+
+bool
+PostRaConstantFolding::visit(Instruction *i)
+{
+ switch (i->op) {
+ case OP_MAD:
+ handleMAD(i);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
return true;
}
@@ -3444,7 +3448,7 @@ Program::optimizePostRA(int level)
{
RUN_PASS(2, FlatteningPass, run);
if (getTarget()->getChipset() < 0xc0)
- RUN_PASS(2, NV50PostRaConstantFolding, run);
+ RUN_PASS(2, PostRaConstantFolding, run);
return true;
}
--
2.10.0
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list