[Mesa-dev] [Bug 98172] Concurrent call to glClientWaitSync results in segfault in one of the waiters.
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Fri Oct 21 12:13:46 UTC 2016
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98172
--- Comment #41 from Suzuki, Shinji <shinji.suzuki at gmail.com> ---
I think now I have better understanding of the problem we are dealing with
here.
>Not thread safe (race condition on so->fence):
> screen->fence_reference(screen, &so->fence, NULL);
>
>Always thread safe (if fence is a local variable):
> screen->fence_reference(screen, &fence, NULL);
I think above can be more concisely stated that
"screen->fence_reference(screen, &fence, NULL);
is thread-safe if calls are serialized otherwise not thread safe".
What's fundamentally wrong with the untouched mesa code is that
screen->fence_reference(screen, &so->fence, NULL) is potentially called more
than once. If the calls are serialized, no crash occurs because the second and
later calls behave as no-op. Protecting each call with a mutex is a way to
assure that serial execution. But that is an indirect resolution of the
problem. A direct resolution is to have screen->fence_reference() not to be
called more than once because that shared reference contributes to only one
increment in the reference count. Below is my latest attempt.
static void st_client_wait_sync(struct gl_context *ctx,
struct gl_sync_object *obj,
GLbitfield flags, GLuint64 timeout)
{
struct pipe_screen *screen = st_context(ctx)->pipe->screen;
struct st_sync_object *so = (struct st_sync_object*)obj;
struct pipe_fence_handle *fence = NULL;
/* Duplicate the reference so that the fence object is guaranteed to
* be alive at least until associated 'unref' below is executed.
* This is important because multiple threads have to execute
* fence_finish() concurrently even if they target same fence object
* to deal with potentially different time-out settings.
*/
screen->fence_reference(screen, &fence, so->fence);
if (fence && screen->fence_finish(screen, fence, timeout)) {
if( p_atomic_cmpxchg(&so->fence, fence, NULL) == fence ) {
/* Get done with 'so->object'. This is a 'unref' op.
* Borrow the value in 'fence' since so->fence is already
* set to NULL by the cmpxchg above.
*/
struct pipe_fence_handle * fence_copy = fence;
screen->fence_reference(screen, &fence_copy, NULL);
}
}
so->b.StatusFlag = GL_TRUE;
screen->fence_reference(screen, &fence, NULL);
}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20161021/ff464da7/attachment.html>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list