[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] gallium/util: libunwind support
Rob Clark
robdclark at gmail.com
Tue Apr 4 12:52:57 UTC 2017
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 4 April 2017 at 10:00, Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom at vmware.com> wrote:
>>> On 04/03/2017 11:09 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom at vmware.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 04/03/2017 07:33 PM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>>>>>>> On 04/03/2017 07:13 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom at vmware.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi, Rob,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 03/24/2017 10:21 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> It's kinda sad that (a) we don't have debug_backtrace support on !X86
>>>>>>>>>> and that (b) we re-invent our own crude backtrace support in the first
>>>>>>>>>> place. If available, use libunwind instead. The backtrace format is
>>>>>>>>>> based on what xserver and weston use, since it is nice not to have to
>>>>>>>>>> figure out a different format.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> Did you consider glibc "backtrace()", I think it's also available on ARM...
>>>>>>>> I had not.. although xserver and weston are already using libunwind.
>>>>>>>> I'm not sure about portability of libunwind to other libc
>>>>>>>> implementations (but I guess it is at least not worse than using a
>>>>>>>> glibc specific API).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I suppose we could always add a fallback to backtrace().
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm. This commit (bisected) appears to break svga/vmwgfx in DEBUG mode:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *** Error in `glxgears': malloc(): memory corruption: 0x00000000025c09c0 ***
>>>>>> Aborted (core dumped)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The svga linux winsys makes extensive use of the backtrace functionality
>>>>>> using u_debug_flush.c
>>>>> ok, I can reproduce.. hopefully patch following shortly..
>>>>>
>>>> So, I found one other minor issue, but the big problem is
>>>> debug_stack_frame size difference, because u_debug_flush.c doesn't
>>>> #include config.h.. adding:
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
>>>> #include <config.h>
>>>> #endif
>>> Hmm,
>>>
>>> Actually it seems we don't have a config.h, but rather -DHAVE_LIBUNWIND
>>> is included in the compile command.
>>
>> That's correct. HAVE_CONFIG_H is never defined and the only config.h
>> file we have is completely unrelated. Thus I'm not sure how the above
>> ifdef hunk helped anyone.
>>
>
>
> hmm.. odd.. unless touching the .h file somehow triggered something to
> recompile? That was definitely the last change I made before it
> stopped crashing. But possibly something got out of whack with
> timestamps or something on my end.
>
btw, I think I realized what happened. I was using a different device
which did not initially have libunwind-devel installed. And I
realized that after installing it and re-./configure'ing the next
build went rather fast. So I guess until I touched u_debug_stack.h
nothing triggered the rest of the .c files that included it to rebuild
after -DHAVE_LIBUNWIND was added to the compile line..
BR,
-R
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list