[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 34/53] i965/drm: Drop GEM_SW_FINISH stuff.
Kenneth Graunke
kenneth at whitecape.org
Wed Apr 5 00:10:24 UTC 2017
This is only useful when doing an incoherent CPU mapping of the current
scanout buffer. That's a terrible plan, so we never do it. We always
use an uncached GTT map.
So, this is useless. Drop the code.
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 24 ------------------------
1 file changed, 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
index 466d9776130..9412a66bc7a 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
@@ -235,9 +235,6 @@ struct _drm_bacon_bo_gem {
* drm_bacon_bufmgr_check_aperture in the common case.
*/
int reloc_tree_size;
-
- /** Flags that we may need to do the SW_FINISH ioctl on unmap. */
- bool mapped_cpu_write;
};
static unsigned int
@@ -1160,9 +1157,6 @@ drm_bacon_bo_map(drm_bacon_bo *bo, int write_enable)
strerror(errno));
}
- if (write_enable)
- bo_gem->mapped_cpu_write = true;
-
drm_bacon_gem_bo_mark_mmaps_incoherent(bo);
VG(VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_DEFINED(bo_gem->mem_virtual, bo->size));
pthread_mutex_unlock(&bufmgr->lock);
@@ -1342,24 +1336,6 @@ drm_bacon_bo_unmap(drm_bacon_bo *bo)
return 0;
}
- if (bo_gem->mapped_cpu_write) {
- struct drm_i915_gem_sw_finish sw_finish;
-
- /* Cause a flush to happen if the buffer's pinned for
- * scanout, so the results show up in a timely manner.
- * Unlike GTT set domains, this only does work if the
- * buffer should be scanout-related.
- */
- memclear(sw_finish);
- sw_finish.handle = bo_gem->gem_handle;
- ret = drmIoctl(bufmgr->fd,
- DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_SW_FINISH,
- &sw_finish);
- ret = ret == -1 ? -errno : 0;
-
- bo_gem->mapped_cpu_write = false;
- }
-
/* We need to unmap after every innovation as we cannot track
* an open vma for every bo as that will exhaust the system
* limits and cause later failures.
--
2.12.1
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list