[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 15/21] anv: Pull the guts of cmd_buffer_execbuf into a helper
Pohjolainen, Topi
topi.pohjolainen at gmail.com
Tue Apr 18 13:26:26 UTC 2017
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:38:02AM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> ---
> src/intel/vulkan/anv_batch_chain.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Topi Pohjolainen <topi.pohjolainen at intel.com>
>
> diff --git a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_batch_chain.c b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_batch_chain.c
> index 3e9fa4c..136f273 100644
> --- a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_batch_chain.c
> +++ b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_batch_chain.c
> @@ -1250,22 +1250,19 @@ relocate_cmd_buffer(struct anv_cmd_buffer *cmd_buffer,
> return true;
> }
>
> -VkResult
> -anv_cmd_buffer_execbuf(struct anv_device *device,
> - struct anv_cmd_buffer *cmd_buffer)
> +static VkResult
> +setup_execbuf_for_cmd_buffer(struct anv_execbuf *execbuf,
> + struct anv_cmd_buffer *cmd_buffer)
> {
> struct anv_batch *batch = &cmd_buffer->batch;
> struct anv_block_pool *ss_pool =
> &cmd_buffer->device->surface_state_block_pool;
>
> - struct anv_execbuf execbuf;
> - anv_execbuf_init(&execbuf);
> -
> adjust_relocations_from_state_pool(ss_pool, &cmd_buffer->surface_relocs,
> cmd_buffer->last_ss_pool_center);
> VkResult result =
> - anv_execbuf_add_bo(&execbuf, &ss_pool->bo, &cmd_buffer->surface_relocs,
> - &device->alloc);
> + anv_execbuf_add_bo(execbuf, &ss_pool->bo, &cmd_buffer->surface_relocs,
> + &cmd_buffer->device->alloc);
> if (result != VK_SUCCESS)
> return result;
>
> @@ -1277,8 +1274,8 @@ anv_cmd_buffer_execbuf(struct anv_device *device,
> adjust_relocations_to_state_pool(ss_pool, &(*bbo)->bo, &(*bbo)->relocs,
> cmd_buffer->last_ss_pool_center);
>
> - result = anv_execbuf_add_bo(&execbuf, &(*bbo)->bo, &(*bbo)->relocs,
> - &device->alloc);
> + result = anv_execbuf_add_bo(execbuf, &(*bbo)->bo, &(*bbo)->relocs,
> + &cmd_buffer->device->alloc);
> if (result != VK_SUCCESS)
> return result;
> }
> @@ -1297,19 +1294,19 @@ anv_cmd_buffer_execbuf(struct anv_device *device,
> * corresponding to the first batch_bo in the chain with the last
> * element in the list.
> */
> - if (first_batch_bo->bo.index != execbuf.bo_count - 1) {
> + if (first_batch_bo->bo.index != execbuf->bo_count - 1) {
> uint32_t idx = first_batch_bo->bo.index;
> - uint32_t last_idx = execbuf.bo_count - 1;
> + uint32_t last_idx = execbuf->bo_count - 1;
>
> - struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 tmp_obj = execbuf.objects[idx];
> - assert(execbuf.bos[idx] == &first_batch_bo->bo);
> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 tmp_obj = execbuf->objects[idx];
> + assert(execbuf->bos[idx] == &first_batch_bo->bo);
>
> - execbuf.objects[idx] = execbuf.objects[last_idx];
> - execbuf.bos[idx] = execbuf.bos[last_idx];
> - execbuf.bos[idx]->index = idx;
> + execbuf->objects[idx] = execbuf->objects[last_idx];
> + execbuf->bos[idx] = execbuf->bos[last_idx];
> + execbuf->bos[idx]->index = idx;
>
> - execbuf.objects[last_idx] = tmp_obj;
> - execbuf.bos[last_idx] = &first_batch_bo->bo;
> + execbuf->objects[last_idx] = tmp_obj;
> + execbuf->bos[last_idx] = &first_batch_bo->bo;
> first_batch_bo->bo.index = last_idx;
> }
>
> @@ -1330,9 +1327,9 @@ anv_cmd_buffer_execbuf(struct anv_device *device,
> }
> }
>
> - execbuf.execbuf = (struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2) {
> - .buffers_ptr = (uintptr_t) execbuf.objects,
> - .buffer_count = execbuf.bo_count,
> + execbuf->execbuf = (struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2) {
> + .buffers_ptr = (uintptr_t) execbuf->objects,
> + .buffer_count = execbuf->bo_count,
> .batch_start_offset = 0,
> .batch_len = batch->next - batch->start,
> .cliprects_ptr = 0,
> @@ -1345,7 +1342,7 @@ anv_cmd_buffer_execbuf(struct anv_device *device,
> .rsvd2 = 0,
> };
>
> - if (relocate_cmd_buffer(cmd_buffer, &execbuf)) {
> + if (relocate_cmd_buffer(cmd_buffer, execbuf)) {
> /* If we were able to successfully relocate everything, tell the kernel
> * that it can skip doing relocations. The requirement for using
> * NO_RELOC is:
> @@ -1370,7 +1367,7 @@ anv_cmd_buffer_execbuf(struct anv_device *device,
> * the RENDER_SURFACE_STATE matches presumed_offset, so it should be
> * safe for the kernel to relocate them as needed.
> */
> - execbuf.execbuf.flags |= I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC;
> + execbuf->execbuf.flags |= I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC;
> } else {
> /* In the case where we fall back to doing kernel relocations, we need
> * to ensure that the relocation list is valid. All relocations on the
> @@ -1385,6 +1382,20 @@ anv_cmd_buffer_execbuf(struct anv_device *device,
> cmd_buffer->surface_relocs.relocs[i].presumed_offset = -1;
> }
>
> + return VK_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +VkResult
> +anv_cmd_buffer_execbuf(struct anv_device *device,
> + struct anv_cmd_buffer *cmd_buffer)
> +{
> + struct anv_execbuf execbuf;
> + anv_execbuf_init(&execbuf);
> +
> + VkResult result = setup_execbuf_for_cmd_buffer(&execbuf, cmd_buffer);
> + if (result != VK_SUCCESS)
> + return result;
> +
> result = anv_device_execbuf(device, &execbuf.execbuf, execbuf.bos);
>
> anv_execbuf_finish(&execbuf, &device->alloc);
> --
> 2.5.0.400.gff86faf
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list