[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] gallium/os: fix os_time_get_nano() to roll over less
Jose Fonseca
jfonseca at vmware.com
Wed Aug 16 22:42:21 UTC 2017
On 16/08/17 23:37, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> On 16/08/17 14:22, Brian Paul wrote:
>> From: Frank Richter <frank.richter at dynardo.de>
>>
>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102241
>> Cc: mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org
>> Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <brianp at vmware.com>
>> ---
>> src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_time.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_time.c
>> b/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_time.c
>> index e169139..e4a1cae 100644
>> --- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_time.c
>> +++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_time.c
>> @@ -69,10 +69,17 @@ os_time_get_nano(void)
>> static LARGE_INTEGER frequency;
>> LARGE_INTEGER counter;
>> + int64_t secs, nanosecs;
>> if(!frequency.QuadPart)
>> QueryPerformanceFrequency(&frequency);
>> QueryPerformanceCounter(&counter);
>> - return counter.QuadPart*INT64_C(1000000000)/frequency.QuadPart;
>> + /* Compute seconds and nanoseconds parts separately to
>> + * reduce severity of precision loss.
>> + */
>> + secs = counter.QuadPart / frequency.QuadPart;
>> + nanosecs = (counter.QuadPart % frequency.QuadPart) *
>> INT64_C(1000000000)
>> + / frequency.QuadPart;
>> + return secs*INT64_C(1000000000) + nanosecs;
>> #else
>>
>
> Series looks great.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Reviewed-by: Jose Fonseca <jfonseca at vmware.com>
BTW, I wonder if we would win by using lldiv(). Because this is often
use for performance measurements, so these extra division might add some
impact.
Jose
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list