[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/9] ralloc: Allow reparenting to a NULL context
Jason Ekstrand
jason at jlekstrand.net
Fri Aug 18 00:39:28 UTC 2017
On August 17, 2017 4:54:42 PM Timothy Arceri <tarceri at itsqueeze.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 18/08/17 09:05, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
>> On Thursday, August 17, 2017 10:22:15 AM PDT Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>> ---
>>> src/util/ralloc.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/util/ralloc.c b/src/util/ralloc.c
>>> index bf46439..4015c7e 100644
>>> --- a/src/util/ralloc.c
>>> +++ b/src/util/ralloc.c
>>> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ ralloc_steal(const void *new_ctx, void *ptr)
>>> return;
>>>
>>> info = get_header(ptr);
>>> - parent = get_header(new_ctx);
>>> + parent = new_ctx ? get_header(new_ctx) : NULL;
>>>
>>> unlink_block(info);
>>>
>>>
>>
>> This patch is:
>> Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
>>
>> ralloc_adopt() doesn't properly handle NULL either, but frankly...
>> reparenting an unknown set of children to the NULL context sounds like a
>> recipe for leaks. :)
>
> I agree. I was wondering if we should create a special function for this:
>
> ralloc_steal_to_NULL_ctx(void *ptr)
I thought about calling it ralloc_unparent or ralloc_orphan
> To void issues like:
>
> ralloc_free(parent->child);
> parent->child = NULL;
>
> ... lots of code in between ...
>
> ralloc_steal(parent->child, ptr);
>
> ralloc_free(parent);
>
> Feel free to tell me I'm being paranoid.
>
>> So I'm not sure it's worth fixing.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mesa-dev mailing list
>> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list