[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 18/22] radeonsi: fix semaphore_server_sync() holding up extra work
Andres Rodriguez
andresx7 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 22 00:41:53 UTC 2017
When calling si_semaphore_server_sync(), the wait operation is associated
with the next kernel submission. Therefore, any unflushed work
submitted previous to semaphore_server_sync() will also be affected by
the wait.
To avoid adding the dependency to the unflushed work, we flush before
emitting the fence dependency.
Signed-off-by: Andres Rodriguez <andresx7 at gmail.com>
---
src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_fence.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_fence.c b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_fence.c
index 7d898d1..2fd1063 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_fence.c
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_fence.c
@@ -114,30 +114,6 @@ struct pipe_semaphore_handle *si_create_fence(struct pipe_context *ctx,
return (struct pipe_semaphore_handle *)fence;
}
-static void si_semaphore_server_sync(struct pipe_context *ctx,
- struct pipe_semaphore_handle *fence)
-{
- struct r600_common_context *rctx = (struct r600_common_context *)ctx;
- struct si_multi_fence *rfence = (struct si_multi_fence *)fence;
-
- util_queue_fence_wait(&rfence->ready);
-
- /* Unflushed fences from the same context are no-ops. */
- if (rfence->gfx_unflushed.ctx &&
- rfence->gfx_unflushed.ctx == rctx)
- return;
-
- /* All unflushed commands will not start execution before
- * this fence dependency is signalled.
- *
- * Should we flush the context to allow more GPU parallelism?
- */
- if (rfence->sdma)
- si_add_fence_dependency(rctx, rfence->sdma);
- if (rfence->gfx)
- si_add_fence_dependency(rctx, rfence->gfx);
-}
-
static bool si_fine_fence_signaled(struct radeon_winsys *rws,
const struct si_fine_fence *fine)
{
@@ -513,6 +489,31 @@ static void si_semaphore_server_signal(struct pipe_context *ctx,
si_flush_from_st(ctx, NULL, PIPE_FLUSH_ASYNC);
}
+static void si_semaphore_server_sync(struct pipe_context *ctx,
+ struct pipe_semaphore_handle *fence)
+{
+ struct r600_common_context *rctx = (struct r600_common_context *)ctx;
+ struct si_multi_fence *rfence = (struct si_multi_fence *)fence;
+
+ util_queue_fence_wait(&rfence->ready);
+
+ /* Unflushed fences from the same context are no-ops. */
+ if (rfence->gfx_unflushed.ctx &&
+ rfence->gfx_unflushed.ctx == rctx)
+ return;
+
+ /* All unflushed commands will not start execution before
+ * this fence dependency is signalled.
+ *
+ * Therefore we must flush before inserting the dependency
+ */
+ si_flush_from_st(ctx, NULL, PIPE_FLUSH_ASYNC);
+
+ if (rfence->sdma)
+ si_add_fence_dependency(rctx, rfence->sdma);
+ if (rfence->gfx)
+ si_add_fence_dependency(rctx, rfence->gfx);
+}
void si_init_fence_functions(struct si_context *ctx)
{
--
2.9.3
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list