[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] configure.ac: LLVM again!

[Marek Olšák]

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29 January 2017 at 23:13, Marek Olšák <maraeo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Tobias Droste <tdroste at gmx.de> wrote:
>>> Am Sonntag, 29. Januar 2017, 22:31:55 CET schrieb Marek Olšák:
>>>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Tobias Droste <tdroste at gmx.de> wrote:
>>>> > Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2017, 16:09:29 CET schrieb Marek Olšák:
>>>> >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>> >> > Can you explain why it's a desirable goal to be able to build radv
>>>> >> > without
>>>> >> > --enable-gallium-llvm? Perhaps it's obvious, but I'm not seeing it.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Jan 28, 2017 8:57 AM, "Tobias Droste" <tdroste at gmx.de> wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > This is a reworked series of the previous LLVM related changes to
>>>> >> > configure.ac that were reverted due to breaking scons.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > This takes a different approach to the previous series and adds an
>>>> >> > extra define for LLVM version checks if RADV is build.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > This allows to build RADV with "--disable-gallium-llvm".
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Patch 1, 2 and 3 are the same as in the previous series, just rebased.
>>>> >> > The new stuff is in patch 3.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Tobias Droste (4):
>>>> >> >   configure.ac: Rename MESA_LLVM to FOUND_LLVM
>>>> >> >   configure.ac: Only set LLVM_LIBS if LLVM is used
>>>> >> >   configure.ac: Separate HAVE_LLVM defines for gallium and radv
>>>> >> >   configure.ac: Don't check LLVM version in gallium_require_llvm
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I fail to see how 2 HAVE_LLVM definitions can be a good idea.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Enabling LLVM by default and allowing people to use --disable-llvm
>>>> >> should be enough for everybody.
>>>> >
>>>> > I don't want this too and there's an obvious easier and better solution to
>>>> > this, but it was NAKed by Jose, because it changed 6 lines in draw (the
>>>> > scons fix is easy):
>>>> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2017-January/141263.html
>>>>
>>>> The link doesn't contain Jose's NAK. He only said that it had broken
>>>> the scons build, and asked you to wait for his review next time.
>>>
>>> It's just the start of the thread. It's over multiple mails.
>>>
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2017-January/141897.html
>>> "2) you're keeping things nice and neat for yourselves by shoving the
>>> ugly bits (like this weird USE_LLVM_FOR_DRAW/HAVE_GALLIUM_LLVM) into
>>> draw/gallivm/llvmpipe, which I simply cannot and will never accept."
>>
>> I don't really care about this stuff too much, but I think adding more
>> HAVE definitions for LLVM sounds like a bad idea, and allowing
>> building radv (with llvm) + softpipe (without llvm) is a use case that
>> won't have any users IMO.
>>
> Having a generic --enable-llvm was suggested by Tobias and Ilia (et al) iirc.
> Doing that leads to a small functionality change - building gallium
> w/o LLVM + radv anyone ?
>
> Regardless we might give it a try for 17.1 and see if/for how many
> people that is an issue.
> For the moment we'll just resolve all the [quirky] combinations to build.

Why do you wanna build Gallium without LLVM + radv?

Marek