[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] configure.ac: describe what all the LIBDRM_*REQUIRED macros mean

Kenneth Graunke kenneth at whitecape.org
Thu Feb 2 17:26:35 UTC 2017


On Thursday, February 2, 2017 9:15:47 AM PST Chad Versace wrote:
> On Thu 02 Feb 2017, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > From: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com>
> > 
> > They are versions of the respective libdrm package. They are _not_ the
> > version of libdrm[.so] required for driver X.
> > 
> > Doing the latter will lead to combinatoric explosion and in all fairness
> > things will likely be broken most of the time.
> > 
> > To make things even more confusing the kernel UAPI is provided by libdrm
> > itself.
> > 
> > Cc: Vinson Lee <vlee at freedesktop.org>
> > Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com>
> > ---
> > Ken, you/Chad have things spot on. Yet semes like other people struggle
> > deeply with these.
> 
> Actually, I agree with airlied and imirkin. I made a mistake when
> I bumped LIBDRM_REQUIRED.

Me too...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20170202/e795695c/attachment.sig>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list