[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] gallium/nine: Fix build regression

[Mike Lothian]

Are we better off just checking for cmst_active now? Since that's all we're
checking

On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 at 11:12 Edward O'Callaghan <funfunctor at folklore1984.net>
wrote:

> commit 4a88396 dropped 'PIPE_CAP_USER_INDEX_BUFFERS' however
> this case was missed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <funfunctor at folklore1984.net>
> ---
>  src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/device9.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/device9.c
> b/src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/device9.c
> index c3924a2..8a75859 100644
> --- a/src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/device9.c
> +++ b/src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/device9.c
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ NineDevice9_ctor( struct NineDevice9 *This,
>      /* Allocate upload helper for drivers that suck (from st pov ;). */
>
>      This->driver_caps.user_vbufs = GET_PCAP(USER_VERTEX_BUFFERS) &&
> !This->csmt_active;
> -    This->driver_caps.user_ibufs = GET_PCAP(USER_INDEX_BUFFERS) &&
> !This->csmt_active;
> +    This->driver_caps.user_ibufs = !This->csmt_active;
>      This->driver_caps.user_cbufs = GET_PCAP(USER_CONSTANT_BUFFERS);
>      This->driver_caps.user_sw_vbufs =
> This->screen_sw->get_param(This->screen_sw, PIPE_CAP_USER_VERTEX_BUFFERS);
>      This->driver_caps.user_sw_cbufs =
> This->screen_sw->get_param(This->screen_sw, PIPE_CAP_USER_CONSTANT_BUFFERS);
> --
> 2.9.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20170225/c898e0f9/attachment.html>