[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2] glsl: reject samplers not declared as uniform/function params earlier
Marek Olšák
maraeo at gmail.com
Mon Feb 27 13:29:16 UTC 2017
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak at amd.com>
Marek
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
<samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote:
> This improves consistency with image variables and atomic
> counters which are already rejected the same way.
>
> Note that opaque variables can't be treated as l-values, which
> means only the 'in' function parameter is allowed.
>
> v2: rewrite commit message
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri <tarceri at itsqueeze.com> (v1)
> ---
> src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp b/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
> index ad1fd9150a..c0629feb58 100644
> --- a/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
> +++ b/src/compiler/glsl/ast_to_hir.cpp
> @@ -3589,6 +3589,15 @@ apply_layout_qualifier_to_variable(const struct ast_type_qualifier *qual,
> }
> }
>
> + if (var->type->contains_sampler()) {
> + if (var->data.mode != ir_var_uniform &&
> + var->data.mode != ir_var_function_in) {
> + _mesa_glsl_error(loc, state, "sampler variables may only be declared "
> + "as function parameters or uniform-qualified "
> + "global variables");
> + }
> + }
> +
> /* Is the 'layout' keyword used with parameters that allow relaxed checking.
> * Many implementations of GL_ARB_fragment_coord_conventions_enable and some
> * implementations (only Mesa?) GL_ARB_explicit_attrib_location_enable
> --
> 2.11.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list