[Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 1/2] intel/isl: Use uint64_t to store total surface size]

[Andres Gomez]

OK, thanks for the feedback! ☺

On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 09:46 -0700, Anuj Phogat wrote:
> These patches are not fixing any known bug. But they are adding the
> previously missing surface size limits for the hardware. It's really hard
> to hit these limits. But, let's pick them to stable for the sake of completion.
> Thanks for marking them for mesa-stable.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Andres Gomez <agomez at igalia.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 18:21 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > > On 3 July 2017 at 21:14, Andres Gomez <agomez at igalia.com> wrote:
> > > > Actually, forgot to add -stable into CC.
> > > > 
> > > > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > > > From: Andres Gomez <agomez at igalia.com>
> > > > To: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat at gmail.com>, mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] intel/isl: Use uint64_t to store
> > > > total surface size
> > > > Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 23:02:31 +0300
> > > > 
> > > > It looks like we could want these 2 into -stable (?)
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Shouldn't hurt, despite that most of the
> > > isl_surf_init/isl_surf_get_[a-z]_surf handling is a simple assert(ok).
> > > I'll leave the call to the experts, but my take is "don't bother".
> > 
> > OK, I'll wait to see if Anuj has anything to say before picking this
> > one, then.
> > 
> > Thanks for the feedback!
> > 
> > --
> > Br,
> > 
> > Andres
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-stable mailing list
> mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-stable
-- 
Br,

Andres