[Mesa-dev] [PATCH V2] i965 : Optimize atom state flag checks

Marathe, Yogesh yogesh.marathe at intel.com
Fri Jul 21 01:00:16 UTC 2017


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Romanick [mailto:idr at freedesktop.org]
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 2:24 AM
> To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.marathe at intel.com>; Muthukumar, Aravindan
> <aravindan.muthukumar at intel.com>; mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH V2] i965 : Optimize atom state flag checks
> 
> On 07/20/2017 12:57 PM, Marathe, Yogesh wrote:
> > Ian,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On
> >> Behalf Of Ian Romanick
> >> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 12:33 AM
> >> To: Muthukumar, Aravindan <aravindan.muthukumar at intel.com>; mesa-
> >> dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH V2] i965 : Optimize atom state flag
> >> checks
> >>
> >> On 07/20/2017 04:35 AM, aravindan.muthukumar at intel.com wrote:
> >>> From: Aravindan Muthukumar <aravindan.muthukumar at intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> This patch improves CPI Rate(Cycles per Instruction) and branch
> >>> mispredict for i965. The function check_state() was showing CPI
> >>> retired rate.
> >>>
> >>> Performance stats with android:
> >>> CPI retired lowered by 28% (lower is better) Branch missprediction
> >>> lowered by 13% (lower is better) 3DMark improved by 2%
> >>>
> >>> The dissassembly doesn't show difference, although above results
> >>> were observed with patch.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Aravindan Muthukumar <aravindan.muthukumar at intel.com>
> >>> Signedd-off-by: Yogesh Marathe <yogesh.marathe at intel.com>
> >>
> >>   Signed-off-by
> >
> > Thanks. Will correct it. May I add you and all who commented as Reviewed-
> by?
> > I won't make a V3 for this since its a change in commit msg.
> 
> No.  You don't add someone's R-b unless they actually say "Reviewed-by".
>  Various people still have issues with the content of this change.
> 

Ok. Got that. Thanks.

> >>> Tested-by: Asish <asish at intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Changes since V1:
> >>> - Removed memset() change
> >>> - Changed commit message as per review comments
> >>
> >> This information should be in the main part of the commit message.
> >>
> >
> > Sure.
> >
> >>>
> >>>  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h      |  4 ++++
> >>>  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_upload.c | 12 ++++++++----
> >>>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h
> >>> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h
> >>> index 2a8dbf8..8c9a510 100644
> >>> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h
> >>> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_defines.h
> >>> @@ -1687,3 +1687,7 @@ enum brw_pixel_shader_coverage_mask_mode {
> #
> >>> define CSDBG2_CONSTANT_BUFFER_ADDRESS_OFFSET_DISABLE (1 << 4)
> >>>
> >>>  #endif
> >>> +
> >>> +/* Checking the state of mesa and brw before emitting atoms */
> >>> +#define CHECK_BRW_STATE(a,b) ((a.mesa & b.mesa) | (a.brw & b.brw))
> >>> +
> >>> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_upload.c
> >>> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_upload.c
> >>> index acaa97e..1c8b969 100644
> >>> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_upload.c
> >>> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_upload.c
> >>> @@ -443,10 +443,8 @@ check_and_emit_atom(struct brw_context *brw,
> >>>                      struct brw_state_flags *state,
> >>>                      const struct brw_tracked_state *atom)  {
> >>> -   if (check_state(state, &atom->dirty)) {
> >>>        atom->emit(brw);
> >>>        merge_ctx_state(brw, state);
> >>> -   }
> >>>  }
> >>>
> >>>  static inline void
> >>> @@ -541,7 +539,10 @@ brw_upload_pipeline_state(struct brw_context
> *brw,
> >>>  	 const struct brw_tracked_state *atom = &atoms[i];
> >>>  	 struct brw_state_flags generated;
> >>>
> >>> -         check_and_emit_atom(brw, &state, atom);
> >>> +         /* Checking the state and emitting atoms */
> >>> +         if (CHECK_BRW_STATE(state, atom->dirty)) {
> >>> +            check_and_emit_atom(brw, &state, atom);
> >>> +         }
> >>>
> >>>  	 accumulate_state(&examined, &atom->dirty);
> >>>
> >>> @@ -558,7 +559,10 @@ brw_upload_pipeline_state(struct brw_context
> *brw,
> >>>        for (i = 0; i < num_atoms; i++) {
> >>>  	 const struct brw_tracked_state *atom = &atoms[i];
> >>>
> >>> -         check_and_emit_atom(brw, &state, atom);
> >>> +         /* Checking the state and emitting atoms */
> >>> +         if (CHECK_BRW_STATE(state, atom->dirty)) {
> >>> +            check_and_emit_atom(brw, &state, atom);
> >>> +         }
> >>>        }
> >>>     }
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mesa-dev mailing list
> >> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list