[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/1] automake: r600 should only depend on libamd_common if opencl is enabled

Emil Velikov emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Mon Jun 5 00:39:50 UTC 2017


On 2 June 2017 at 17:34, Jan Vesely <jan.vesely at rutgers.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 17:22 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 2 June 2017 at 16:34, Jan Vesely <jan.vesely at rutgers.edu> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 12:19 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> > > On 1 June 2017 at 21:28, Jan Vesely <jan.vesely at rutgers.edu> wrote:
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely at rutgers.edu>
>> > > > ---
>> > > > Hi guys,
>> > > >
>> > > > this is the first step towards dropping libamd_common dependency.
>> > > > It's based on Emil's patches 3/5 and 4/5.
>> > > > Enabling opencl still falls back to the old way of requiring libamd_common.
>> > > > I'll try to address that in the next step (no time estimate, feel
>> > > > free to beat me to it). I think we can drop part of those functions
>> > > > rather than just copying them.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > AFAICT one still need the rest of my series, correct?
>> >
>> > kind of, 1/5 is mostly unrelated. 2,3/5 should be replaced by this one.
>> > 4/5 is needed,
>> > and 5/5 seems to be not applicable since ac_gpu_info.c
>> > still needs the header.
>> >
>>
>> Hmm indeed. I seems to have misread your patch.
>> Which makes me wonder if you've tested the patch as I mentioned earlier:
>>  - (re)move amdgpu.h
>>  - apply mesa patches (be that any of my, your and other mix)
>>  - build r300 and/or r600, w/o radeonsi
>>  - the the above combo a try with and w/o opencl
>>
>> I'm leaning that things will fail to build?
>
> This patch only removes dependence on libamd_common unless you enable
> OpenCL.
Right - this thing here needs to be fixed. Rather than
pressuring/annoying you to "fix it now", I'll kindly suggest opting
for the neutering series as an intermediate step. We already had five
(iirc) separate reports about this :-(

> I haven't addressed the hacky way of using ac_gpu_info.h
> Applying 4/5v2 from your series should work OK on top of my patch.
>
Indeed, v2 4/5 resolves the header dependency.

-Emil


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list