[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 3/3] radeonsi: don't emit DB_STENCIL_CONTROL if it has no effect
Samuel Pitoiset
samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com
Fri Jun 9 14:31:49 UTC 2017
On 06/09/2017 04:26 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
> <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/09/2017 03:49 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak at amd.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c
>>> b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c
>>> index 53f66ac..a8255f2 100644
>>> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c
>>> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c
>>> @@ -1078,21 +1078,22 @@ static void *si_create_dsa_state(struct
>>> pipe_context *ctx,
>>> if (state->alpha.enabled) {
>>> dsa->alpha_func = state->alpha.func;
>>> si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_00B030_SPI_SHADER_USER_DATA_PS_0 +
>>> SI_SGPR_ALPHA_REF * 4,
>>> fui(state->alpha.ref_value));
>>> } else {
>>> dsa->alpha_func = PIPE_FUNC_ALWAYS;
>>> }
>>> si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_028800_DB_DEPTH_CONTROL, db_depth_control);
>>> - si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_02842C_DB_STENCIL_CONTROL,
>>> db_stencil_control);
>>> + if (state->stencil[0].enabled)
>>> + si_pm4_set_reg(pm4, R_02842C_DB_STENCIL_CONTROL,
>>> db_stencil_control);
>>
>>
>> How if stencil is enabled, then disabled? Doesn't this reg has to be set to
>> 0?
>
> DB_DEPTH_CONTROL enables and disables stencil.
Right.
Can't we move this in the same if above?
Except this nitpick, series is:
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com>
>
> Marek
>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list