[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 13/15] i965/miptree: Prepare stencil mapping for isl based

Jason Ekstrand jason at jlekstrand.net
Thu Jun 15 18:48:31 UTC 2017


On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Topi Pohjolainen <
topi.pohjolainen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Topi Pohjolainen <topi.pohjolainen at intel.com>
> ---
>  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c | 32
> +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> index 0854b4eb5d..ecb9186715 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> @@ -3262,6 +3262,12 @@ intel_miptree_map_s8(struct brw_context *brw,
>      * temporary buffer back out.
>      */
>     if (!(map->mode & GL_MAP_INVALIDATE_RANGE_BIT)) {
> +      /* ISL uses a stencil pitch value that is expected by hardware
> whereas
> +       * traditional miptree uses half of that. Below the value gets
> supplied
> +       * to intel_offset_S8() which expects the legacy interpretation.
> +       */
> +      const unsigned pitch = mt->surf.size > 0 ?
> +                             mt->surf.row_pitch / 2 : mt->pitch;
>        uint8_t *untiled_s8_map = map->ptr;
>        uint8_t *tiled_s8_map = intel_miptree_map_raw(brw, mt,
> GL_MAP_READ_BIT);
>        unsigned int image_x, image_y;
> @@ -3270,7 +3276,7 @@ intel_miptree_map_s8(struct brw_context *brw,
>
>        for (uint32_t y = 0; y < map->h; y++) {
>          for (uint32_t x = 0; x < map->w; x++) {
> -           ptrdiff_t offset = intel_offset_S8(mt->pitch,
> +           ptrdiff_t offset = intel_offset_S8(pitch,
>

Once this is all over, intel_offset_S8 should be updated to just use the
ISL convention.


>                                                x + image_x + map->x,
>                                                y + image_y + map->y,
>                                                brw->has_swizzling);
> @@ -3298,6 +3304,12 @@ intel_miptree_unmap_s8(struct brw_context *brw,
>                        unsigned int slice)
>  {
>     if (map->mode & GL_MAP_WRITE_BIT) {
> +      /* ISL uses a stencil pitch value that is expected by hardware
> whereas
> +       * traditional miptree uses half of that. Below the value gets
> supplied
> +       * to intel_offset_S8() which expects the legacy interpretation.
> +       */
> +      const unsigned pitch = mt->surf.size > 0 ?
> +                             mt->surf.row_pitch / 2: mt->pitch;
>        unsigned int image_x, image_y;
>        uint8_t *untiled_s8_map = map->ptr;
>        uint8_t *tiled_s8_map = intel_miptree_map_raw(brw, mt,
> GL_MAP_WRITE_BIT);
> @@ -3306,7 +3318,7 @@ intel_miptree_unmap_s8(struct brw_context *brw,
>
>        for (uint32_t y = 0; y < map->h; y++) {
>          for (uint32_t x = 0; x < map->w; x++) {
> -           ptrdiff_t offset = intel_offset_S8(mt->pitch,
> +           ptrdiff_t offset = intel_offset_S8(pitch,
>                                                image_x + x + map->x,
>                                                image_y + y + map->y,
>                                                brw->has_swizzling);
> @@ -3405,6 +3417,12 @@ intel_miptree_map_depthstencil(struct brw_context
> *brw,
>      * temporary buffer back out.
>      */
>     if (!(map->mode & GL_MAP_INVALIDATE_RANGE_BIT)) {
> +      /* ISL uses a stencil pitch value that is expected by hardware
> whereas
> +       * traditional miptree uses half of that. Below the value gets
> supplied
> +       * to intel_offset_S8() which expects the legacy interpretation.
> +       */
> +      const unsigned s_pitch = s_mt->surf.size > 0 ?
> +                               s_mt->surf.row_pitch / 2 : s_mt->pitch;
>        uint32_t *packed_map = map->ptr;
>        uint8_t *s_map = intel_miptree_map_raw(brw, s_mt, GL_MAP_READ_BIT);
>        uint32_t *z_map = intel_miptree_map_raw(brw, z_mt, GL_MAP_READ_BIT);
> @@ -3419,7 +3437,7 @@ intel_miptree_map_depthstencil(struct brw_context
> *brw,
>        for (uint32_t y = 0; y < map->h; y++) {
>          for (uint32_t x = 0; x < map->w; x++) {
>             int map_x = map->x + x, map_y = map->y + y;
> -           ptrdiff_t s_offset = intel_offset_S8(s_mt->pitch,
> +           ptrdiff_t s_offset = intel_offset_S8(s_pitch,
>                                                  map_x + s_image_x,
>                                                  map_y + s_image_y,
>                                                  brw->has_swizzling);
> @@ -3466,6 +3484,12 @@ intel_miptree_unmap_depthstencil(struct
> brw_context *brw,
>     bool map_z32f_x24s8 = mt->format == MESA_FORMAT_Z_FLOAT32;
>
>     if (map->mode & GL_MAP_WRITE_BIT) {
> +      /* ISL uses a stencil pitch value that is expected by hardware
> whereas
> +       * traditional miptree uses half of that. Below the value gets
> supplied
> +       * to intel_offset_S8() which expects the legacy interpretation.
> +       */
> +      const unsigned s_pitch = s_mt->surf.size > 0 ?
> +                               s_mt->surf.row_pitch / 2 : s_mt->pitch;
>        uint32_t *packed_map = map->ptr;
>        uint8_t *s_map = intel_miptree_map_raw(brw, s_mt, GL_MAP_WRITE_BIT);
>        uint32_t *z_map = intel_miptree_map_raw(brw, z_mt,
> GL_MAP_WRITE_BIT);
> @@ -3479,7 +3503,7 @@ intel_miptree_unmap_depthstencil(struct brw_context
> *brw,
>
>        for (uint32_t y = 0; y < map->h; y++) {
>          for (uint32_t x = 0; x < map->w; x++) {
> -           ptrdiff_t s_offset = intel_offset_S8(s_mt->pitch,
> +           ptrdiff_t s_offset = intel_offset_S8(s_pitch,
>                                                  x + s_image_x + map->x,
>                                                  y + s_image_y + map->y,
>                                                  brw->has_swizzling);
> --
> 2.11.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20170615/3a027145/attachment.html>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list