[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 05/13] anv: Add and use color auxiliary buffer helpers

Nanley Chery nanleychery at gmail.com
Mon Jun 19 23:46:07 UTC 2017


On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 04:16:32PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Nanley Chery <nanleychery at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > v2:
> > - Check for aux levels in layer helper (Jason Ekstrand)
> > - Don't assert aux is present, return 0 if it isn't.
> > - Use the helpers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.chery at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  src/intel/vulkan/anv_blorp.c   |  4 ++++
> >  src/intel/vulkan/anv_private.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > +++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_blorp.c b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_blorp.c
> > index a869eebc24..421f860428 100644
> > --- a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_blorp.c
> > +++ b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_blorp.c
> > @@ -1436,6 +1436,7 @@ anv_image_ccs_clear(struct anv_cmd_buffer
> > *cmd_buffer,
> >                      const struct isl_view *view,
> >                      const VkImageSubresourceRange *subresourceRange)
> >  {
> > +   assert(anv_image_has_color_aux(image) && image->samples == 1);
> >     assert(image->type == VK_IMAGE_TYPE_3D || image->extent.depth == 1);
> >
> >     struct blorp_batch batch;
> > @@ -1488,6 +1489,9 @@ anv_image_ccs_clear(struct anv_cmd_buffer
> > *cmd_buffer,
> >           blorp_layer_count = anv_get_layerCount(image, subresourceRange);
> >        }
> >
> > +      assert(level < anv_color_aux_levels(image));
> > +      assert(blorp_base_layer + blorp_layer_count <=
> > +             anv_color_aux_layers(image, level));
> >        blorp_fast_clear(&batch, &surf, surf.surf->format,
> >                         level, blorp_base_layer, blorp_layer_count,
> >                         0, 0, extent.width, extent.height);
> > diff --git a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_private.h b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_
> > private.h
> > index fe6ac3bc1b..32aec7782b 100644
> > --- a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_private.h
> > +++ b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_private.h
> > @@ -2071,6 +2071,45 @@ struct anv_image {
> >     struct anv_surface aux_surface;
> >  };
> >
> > +/* Return whether or not the image has a color auxiliary buffer. */
> > +static inline bool
> > +anv_image_has_color_aux(const struct anv_image * const image)
> > +{
> > +   assert(image);
> > +
> > +   return image->aspects == VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_COLOR_BIT &&
> > +          image->aux_surface.isl.size > 0;
> >
> 
> I'm not a big fan of conflating CCS and MCS.  We do that in i965 today and
> it's no end of pain.  How about anv_image_has_ccs and restrict on sample
> count as well?  Same comment applies to the two below.
> 
> 

I'm not sure I understand your concern here, but I can create two
functions instead. I think most of the callers of this function only
care about whether or not there's a color buffer with CCS or MCS.
(You can find more of the callers here:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~nchery/mesa/log/?h=vk/perf/layout-ccsd-resolves-v3 )

> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Returns the number of auxiliary buffer levels attached to a color
> > image. */
> > +static inline uint8_t
> > +anv_color_aux_levels(const struct anv_image * const image)
> > +{
> > +   assert(image && image->aspects == VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_COLOR_BIT);
> > +   return anv_image_has_color_aux(image) ? image->aux_surface.isl.levels
> > : 0;
> >
> 
> Is there some reason why we can't or shouldn't assert anv_image_has_ccs?  I
> haven't read all of the users of these helpers so maybe there's something
> really useful about having them silently return 0.
> 
> 

We did previously. With your suggestion of returning 0 in the below
function, I thought that it would make sense to give this function the
same behavior.

> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Returns the number of auxiliary buffer layers attached to a color
> > image. */
> > +static inline uint32_t
> > +anv_color_aux_layers(const struct anv_image * const image,
> > +                     const uint8_t miplevel)
> > +{
> > +   assert(image && image->aspects == VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_COLOR_BIT);
> > +
> > +   /* The miplevel must exist in the main buffer. */
> > +   assert(miplevel < image->levels);
> >
> 
> Similarly can we or should we assert that miplevel < anv_color_aux_levels()?
> 
> 

I'm confused, you suggested that we return 0 in your previous review of
this patch.

> > +
> > +   if (miplevel >= anv_color_aux_levels(image)) {
> > +      /* There are no layers with auxiliary data because the miplevel has
> > no
> > +       * auxiliary data.
> > +       */
> > +      return 0;
> > +   } else {
> > +      return MAX2(image->aux_surface.isl.logical_level0_px.array_len,
> > +                  image->aux_surface.isl.logical_level0_px.depth >>
> > miplevel);
> > +   }
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* Returns true if a HiZ-enabled depth buffer can be sampled from. */
> >  static inline bool
> >  anv_can_sample_with_hiz(const struct gen_device_info * const devinfo,
> > --
> > 2.13.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mesa-dev mailing list
> > mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
> >


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list