[Mesa-dev] Mesa 17.0.1 release candidate
Emil Velikov
emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Thu Mar 2 11:41:07 UTC 2017
On 2 March 2017 at 03:44, Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote:
> On 02/03/17 03:35 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> The candidate for the Mesa 17.0.1 is now available. Currently we have:
>> - 60 queued
>> - 9 nominated (outstanding)
>> - and 0 rejected patch(es)
>>
>>
>> The current queue consists of:
>>
>> On the GLX/EGL front we have a GLVND fix for "The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth"
>> and other games, eglQuerySurface now returns correct geometry when running
>> under X11/DRI3.
>>
>> There's a number of crash fixes affecting all Gallium drivers. An old
>> regression fix for r300 on BE hardware been fixed. The radeonsi driver has
>> fixes for Tessellation shaders on Carrizo and Stoney hardware.
>>
>> While on the nouveau side, compute shader have been improved on some
>> nvc0 devices.
>>
>> The vc4 and etnaviv drivers have also seen a couple of small fixe.
>>
>> For the Intel drivers (both GL and Vulkan) we have a diverse bunch of patches -
>> from CTS fixes for Sandy Bridge, to improved swizzle clears and improved
>> handling of GPUs without (Last Level Cache) LLC.
>>
>> On integration side - we had some Android build fixes and a new script to
>> parse and look for bug fixes.
>>
>>
>> And for those of you wondering - the delay was caused by a buggy optimisation
>> pass, that has since been removed.
>>
>>
>> Take a look at section "Mesa stable queue" for more information.
>>
>>
>> Testing reports/general approval
>> --------------------------------
>> Any testing reports (or general approval of the state of the branch) will be
>> greatly appreciated.
>>
>> The plan is to have 17.0.1 this Friday (3th of March), around or shortly
>> after 19:00 GMT.
>>
>> If you have any questions or suggestions - be that about the current patch
>> queue or otherwise, please go ahead.
>
> Consider backporting 0f53404565b9ef9da9d7022b5732463acd496742 for
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/100028 .
>
Ack, will do.
>
> P.S. It would be better to put the mesa-announce list only in Bcc on
> this kind of e-mails, to prevent accidental followups there. Reply-to:
> mesa-dev seems useless for that.
>
Great idea, tyvm !
-Emil
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list