[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/6] r600g: r600_shader.c small cleanups

Constantine Charlamov Hi-Angel at yandex.ru
Sun Mar 5 12:43:42 UTC 2017


On 28.02.2017 05:44, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 28 February 2017 at 12:42, Constantine Charlamov <Hi-Angel at yandex.ru> wrote:
>> On 28.02.2017 05:19, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> On 27 February 2017 at 06:31, Constantine Charlamov <Hi-Angel at yandex.ru> wrote: >> Initially I was trying to implement for r600 optimization like in the d633e23192ef17207f4a6acd3009da3126aab395 commit for radeonsi, but failed because I need to learn some more about GPUs internals. For another time. Anyway, accidentally it turned into a small cleanup of r600_shader.c, here it
>> is. >> >> Hi-Angel (6): >>   Get rid of trailing whitespace (trivial) >>   Rename i→chan_index >>   Replace bit-shifts and cycles with helpers from tgsi_exec.h >>   Rename tgsi_last_instruction → tgsi_last_channel >>   Get rid of tgsi_last_channel() wherever possible, rename lasti → >>     last_chan
>>>>   Remove redudant comparisons > > > Have they passed a complete piglit run without regressions? > > Dave.
>>
>> Hmm I don't know. Is there some specific test I should be running? I indeed tried
>>
>>     ./piglit run shader results/shader --all-concurrent
> 
> piglit run -c tests/gpu.py results/gpu
> 
> I'm not sure how long an r600 run takes, I haven't ran it in a while,
> but any patches that clean stuff up should probably make sure they
> don't cause regressions on the way.
> 
> Dave.
> 

Thank you. Unfortunately piglit-testing with mesa-master makes my GPU to lockup. It doesn't happen with 17.0 branch though, but the patchset doesn't apply there cleanly. Any suggestion for how to find which test causes lockup?


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list